The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
L�vy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)
Abstract
Scale invariant patterns have been found in different biological systems, in many cases resembling what physicists have found in other, nonbiological systems. Here we describe the foraging patterns of free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in the forest of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico and find that these patterns closely resemble what physicists know as Lévy walks. First, the length of a trajectory’s constituent steps, or continuous moves in the same direction, is best described by a power-law distribution in which the frequency of ever larger steps decreases as a negative power function of their length. The rate of this decrease is very close to that predicted by a previous analytical Lévy walk model to be an optimal strategy to search for scarce resources distributed at random. Second, the frequency distribution of the duration of stops or waiting times also approximates to a power-law function. Finally, the mean square displacement during the monkeys’ first foraging trip increases more rapidly than would be expected from a random walk with constant step length, but within the range predicted for Lévy walks. In view of these results, we analyze the different exponents characterizing the trajectories described by females and males, and by monkeys on their own and when part of a subgroup. We discuss the origin of these patterns and their implications for the foraging ecology of spider monkeys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges
Haskell, J. P., Ritchie, M. E., & Olff, H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00840 · Cited by 354
Cited by
Scaling laws in cognitive sciences
Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D. A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.005 · Cited by 384
Lévy Flights in Dobe Ju/’hoansi Foraging Patterns
Brown, C. T., Liebovitch, L. S., & Glendon, R. (2007) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9083-4 · Cited by 346
Turn costs change the value of animal search paths.
Wilson, R. P., Griffiths, I. W., Legg, P. A., Friswell, M. I., Bidder, O. R., Halsey, L. G., Lambertucci, S. A., & Shepard, E. L. C. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12149 · Cited by 142
Brantingham, P. J. (2006) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/503062 · Cited by 111
Pappalardo, L., Simini, F., Barlacchi, G., & Pellungrini, R. (2022) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v103.i04 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayala-Orozco, B., Cocho, G., Larralde, H., Ramos-Fern�ndez, G., Mateos, J. L., & Miramontes, O.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-230
- ISSN
- 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0762
- OpenAlex
- W1972724889
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.