Cited by 202Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFood Waste Reduction and Sustainability

An Environmental Assessment of Food Supply Chains: A Case Study on Dessert Apples

JONES, ANDY·2002·Environmental Management

Abstract

The contemporary food system provides consumers with convenience, extensive choice, and the year-round availability of fresh produce. In this paper these achievements are recognized within the context of the associated environmental impacts. While many analyses have considered the energy and material efficiency of various options for food production and packaging, very few studies have investigated the environmental impacts of the transport components of food supply chains. This is surprising, given that the global sourcing of food produce, centralized distribution systems, and shopping by car have become prevalent in recent decades and have contributed to an increase in the distance between producer and consumer or "food miles." In a case study the transport energy consumption is calculated for all possible ways in which dessert apples can be supplied to the UK consumer. The aim is to assess the environmental performance of the predominant fresh produce supply chains and to investigate claims that localized systems are more environmentally efficient. The main criteria used to compare the environmental efficiency in alternative food supply chains are the transport-related fossil-fuel energy consumption and associated carbon dioxide emissions. Analysis of the empirical data shows that transportation is now responsible for a considerable fraction of the total energy consumption in the life cycle of fresh apples, and in most cases exceeds the energy consumed in commercial apple cultivation. By developing local production and marketing systems for fresh products, transport demand can be reduced and many of the environmental impacts associated with existing supply chains can be avoided. The results of the study are then discussed in relation to the wider issues of transport policy, international trade, food security, and product-related environmental information for consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00267-002-2383-6

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JONES, A.
Affiliations
Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
JONES, ANDY
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
560-576
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W2057198027
Cited by
202
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Keywords
food supply chain, dessert apples, food miles, transportation energy use, CO2 emissions, local food production, fresh produce distribution, life cycle assessment, transport policy, international trade, food security, environmental labelling
MeSH terms
Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Desert Climate, Energy-Generating Resources, Fruit, Humans, International Cooperation, Transportation, Food Industry, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review