Cited by 248Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Heat Island MitigationUrban Planning and Landscape Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perspectives on the Use of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management in Cleveland and Milwaukee

Abstract

Green infrastructure is a general term referring to the management of landscapes in ways that generate human and ecosystem benefits. Many municipalities have begun to utilize green infrastructure in efforts to meet stormwater management goals. This study examines challenges to integrating gray and green infrastructure for stormwater management, informed by interviews with practitioners in Cleveland, OH and Milwaukee WI. Green infrastructure in these cities is utilized under conditions of extreme fiscal austerity and its use presents opportunities to connect stormwater management with urban revitalization and economic recovery while planning for the effects of negative- or zero-population growth. In this context, specific challenges in capturing the multiple benefits of green infrastructure exist because the projects required to meet federally mandated stormwater management targets and the needs of urban redevelopment frequently differ in scale and location.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 46 references

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Brown R, Clarke J (2007) Transition to water sensative urban design: the story of Melbourne, Australia. Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash University, Clayton
  2. Doll A, Scodari PF, Lindsey G (1999). Credits as economic incentives for on-site stormwater management: issues and examples. In: Proceedings of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Conference on Retrofit Opportunities for Water Resource Protection in Urban Environments, Chicago, pp 113–117
  3. Hull P (2000) NPDES phase II: the next phase. Eros Control J 7(1):40–47
  4. Lach D, Ingram H, Rayner S (2005) Maintaining the status quo: how institutional norms and practices create conservative water organizations. Tex Law Rev 80:2027–2053
  5. Larson K (2009) Social acceptability of water resource management: a conceptual approach Resources Conference. http://www.gwri.gatech.edu/uploads/proceedings/1999/MillerA-99.pdf . Accessed 3 Sept 2011
  6. Livingston D, Ashbolt N, Colebatch H (2006) Institutional barriers to decentralized systems. J Aust Water Assoc 33(3):75–77
  7. Miller AE, Kundell JE (1999) Insight into state and local government responsibilities for effective watershed management in Georgia. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Georgia Water Resources Conference. http://www.gwri.gatech.edu/uploads/proceedings/1999/MillerA-99.pdf . Accessed 3 Sept 2011
  8. Pitt R et al. (2003) Evaluation of NPDES phase 1 municipal stormwater monitoring data (EPA/625/R-03/003). In: National conference on Urban stormwater: enhancing the programs at the local level, pp 306–327

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 248

Metadata

Authors
Keeley, M., Koburger, A., Dolowitz, D. P., Medearis, D., Nickel, D., & Shuster, W.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Ecologic Institute (DE)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Keeley, Melissa
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
2013-04-24
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1093-1108
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W2059640381
Cited by
248
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Research and Development
  • George Washington University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
green infrastructure, stormwater management, urban regeneration, economic recovery, population decline, practitioner perspectives, Cleveland (Ohio), Milwaukee
MeSH terms
Cities, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ohio, Rain, Wisconsin, Waste Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review