The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspectives on the Use of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management in Cleveland and Milwaukee
Abstract
Green infrastructure is a general term referring to the management of landscapes in ways that generate human and ecosystem benefits. Many municipalities have begun to utilize green infrastructure in efforts to meet stormwater management goals. This study examines challenges to integrating gray and green infrastructure for stormwater management, informed by interviews with practitioners in Cleveland, OH and Milwaukee WI. Green infrastructure in these cities is utilized under conditions of extreme fiscal austerity and its use presents opportunities to connect stormwater management with urban revitalization and economic recovery while planning for the effects of negative- or zero-population growth. In this context, specific challenges in capturing the multiple benefits of green infrastructure exist because the projects required to meet federally mandated stormwater management targets and the needs of urban redevelopment frequently differ in scale and location.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Stormwater infrastructure across the US is rapidly aging past its intended lifespan (Keeley et al. 2013;Hoover and Hopton 2019;Vineyard et al. 2015;Meng and Hsu 2019).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Keeley et al. 2013
In the citing paper
“Fees based on some measure of per-unit runoff or impervious cover level from parcels can directly fund stormwater management (Eisen 1995;National Research Council (NRC) 2009;Keeley et al. 2013;Kea et al. 2016)”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Keeley et al. 2013
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
Research methods in the social sciences
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-6257 · Cited by 3,129
Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli‐Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemelä, J. K., & James, P. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,894
Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social?Ecological Systems
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7 · Cited by 1,863
Greening the Rust Belt: A Green Infrastructure Model for Right Sizing America's Shrinking Cities
Schilling, J., & Logan, J. (2008) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944360802354956 · Cited by 765
Roy, A. H., Wenger, S. J., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Ladson, A. R., Shuster, W. D., Thurston, H. W., & Brown, R. R. (2008) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1 · Cited by 613
Self-citationRootshock: how tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America, and what we can do about it
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3733 · Cited by 544
Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face
Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2009) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2009.028 · Cited by 371
Integrated Water Resource Management, Institutional Arrangements, and Land-Use Planning
Mitchell, B. (2005) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37224 · Cited by 307
Rapid assessment of the cost-effectiveness of low impact development for CSO control
Montalto, F., Behr, C., Alfredo, K., Wolf, M., Arye, M., & Walsh, M. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.004 · Cited by 264
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Brown R, Clarke J (2007) Transition to water sensative urban design: the story of Melbourne, Australia. Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash University, Clayton
- Doll A, Scodari PF, Lindsey G (1999). Credits as economic incentives for on-site stormwater management: issues and examples. In: Proceedings of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Conference on Retrofit Opportunities for Water Resource Protection in Urban Environments, Chicago, pp 113–117
- Hull P (2000) NPDES phase II: the next phase. Eros Control J 7(1):40–47
- Lach D, Ingram H, Rayner S (2005) Maintaining the status quo: how institutional norms and practices create conservative water organizations. Tex Law Rev 80:2027–2053
- Larson K (2009) Social acceptability of water resource management: a conceptual approach Resources Conference. http://www.gwri.gatech.edu/uploads/proceedings/1999/MillerA-99.pdf . Accessed 3 Sept 2011
- Livingston D, Ashbolt N, Colebatch H (2006) Institutional barriers to decentralized systems. J Aust Water Assoc 33(3):75–77
- Miller AE, Kundell JE (1999) Insight into state and local government responsibilities for effective watershed management in Georgia. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Georgia Water Resources Conference. http://www.gwri.gatech.edu/uploads/proceedings/1999/MillerA-99.pdf . Accessed 3 Sept 2011
- Pitt R et al. (2003) Evaluation of NPDES phase 1 municipal stormwater monitoring data (EPA/625/R-03/003). In: National conference on Urban stormwater: enhancing the programs at the local level, pp 306–327
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L., et al. (2015) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2014.916314 · Cited by 1,938
Self-citationA systematic review of industrial wastewater management: Evaluating challenges and enablers
Singh, B. J., Chakraborty, A., & Sehgal, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119230 · Cited by 677
Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas
Brink, E., Aalders, T., Ádám, D., Feller, R., Henselek, Y., Hoffmann, A., Ibe, K., Matthey-Doret, A., Meyer, M., Negrut, N. L., et al. (2016) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003 · Cited by 398
Dhakal, K. P., & Chevalier, L. R. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065 · Cited by 375
Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review
Ferreira, V., Barreira, A., Loures, L., Antunes, D., & Panagopoulos, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020640 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeley, M., Koburger, A., Dolowitz, D. P., Medearis, D., Nickel, D., & Shuster, W.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Ecologic Institute (DE)
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keeley, Melissa
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 2013-04-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1093-1108
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W2059640381
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Research and Development
- George Washington University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- green infrastructure, stormwater management, urban regeneration, economic recovery, population decline, practitioner perspectives, Cleveland (Ohio), Milwaukee
- MeSH terms
- Cities, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ohio, Rain, Wisconsin, Waste Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review