Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Postsurgical Infections are Reduced with Specialized Nutrition Support

Waitzberg, Dan L., Saito, Hideaki, Plank, Lindsay D., Jamieson, Glyn G., Jagannath, Palepu, Hwang, Tsann‐Long, Mijares, Juan M., Bihari, David·2006·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to examine the relationship between pre‐, peri‐, and postoperative specialized nutritional support with immune‐modulating nutrients and postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing elective surgery. Methods: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, review article bibliographies, and abstracts and proceedings of scientific meetings. All randomized clinical trials in which patients were supplemented by the IMPACT formula before and/or after elective surgery and the clinical outcomes reported were included in the meta‐analysis. Seventeen studies (n = 2,305), 14 published (n = 2,102), and 3 unpublished (n = 203), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ten studies (n = 1,392) examined the efficacy of pre‐ or perioperative IMPACT supplementation in patients undergoing elective surgery, whereas 7 (n = 913) assessed postoperative efficacy. Fourteen of the studies (n = 2,083) involved gastrointestinal (GI) surgical patients. Postoperative complications, mortality, and length of stay in hospital (LOS) were major outcomes of interest. Results: IMPACT supplementation, in general, was associated with significant (39%–61%) reductions in postoperative infectious complications and a significant decrease in LOS in hospital by an average of 2 days. The greatest improvement in postoperative outcomes was observed in patients receiving specialized nutrition support as part of their preoperative treatment. In GI surgical patients, anastomotic leaks were 46% less prevalent when IMPACT supplementation was part of the preoperative treatment. Conclusion: This study identifies a dosage (0.5–1 l/day) and duration (supplementation for 5–7 days before surgery) of IMPACT that contributes to improved outcomes of morbidity in elective surgery patients, particularly those undergoing GI surgical procedures. The cost effectiveness of such practice is supported by recent health economic analysis. Findings suggest preoperative IMPACT use for the prophylaxis of postoperative complications in elective surgical patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-005-0657-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Waitzberg, D. L., Saito, H., Plank, L. D., Jamieson, G. G., Jagannath, P., Hwang, T., Mijares, J. M., & Bihari, D.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-16
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1592-1604
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2014034051
Cited by
279
References
0
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postsurgical Infections are Reduced with Specialized Nutrition Support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-005-0657-x
The paper
Waitzberg, D. L., Saito, H., Plank, L. D., Jamieson, G. G., Jagannath, P., Hwang, T., Mijares, J. M., & Bihari, D. (2006). Postsurgical Infections are Reduced with Specialized Nutrition Support. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0657-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.