Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk Factors and Outcomes for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery: A Single‐Institution Analysis of 1576 Patients

Boccola, Mark A., Buettner, Petra G., Rozen, Warren M., Siu, Simon K., Stevenson, Andrew R. L., Stitz, Russell, Ho, Yik‐Hong·2011·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage is associated with high mortality, high reoperation rate, and increased hospital length of stay. Although many studies have examined the risk factors for anastomotic leak, large prospective series that report on long‐term survival rates are lacking. Methods: Data of 1576 patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis for colorectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 1984 to 2004 were prospectively collected. Anastomotic leaks (LEK) were classified as radiological (RAD), local (LOC), or generalised (GEN). Logistic regression analysis of 21 variables was undertaken. Overall survival, cancer‐related survival, and disease‐free survival were analysed using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Results: Mean age of the patients was 67 years (SD = 12.5) and 834 (52.9%) were male. An LEK was more likely when relatively major gynaecological (tubo‐oophorectomy, P = 0.004; hysterectomy, P = 0.006) or urological (total cystectomy, P = 0.014) procedures were performed during the same operative session. Other significant factors were anterior resection (P < 0.001), anastomosis using an intraluminal stapling device (P = 0.005), abdominal drain via laparoscopic port (P = 0.024), postoperative blood transfusion (P < 0.001), primary cancer site at the rectum (P = 0.016), and TNM stage of T2 or higher (P = 0.026). Having an LEK showed significant impact on overall (P = 0.021), cancer‐related (P = 0.006), and disease‐free (P = 0.001) survival. Conclusion: In this prospective study, advanced tumour stage, distal site, and need for postoperative blood transfusion were associated with increased rates of anastomotic leakage. In addition to their high risk of immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality, both localized and generalized leaks had similarly negative impacts on overall, cancer‐related, and disease‐free survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Boccola, M. A., Buettner, P. G., Rozen, W. M., Siu, S. K., Stevenson, A. R. L., Stitz, R., & Ho, Y.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-23
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
186-195
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2070451748
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors and Outcomes for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery: A Single‐Institution Analysis of 1576 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7
The paper
Boccola, M. A., Buettner, P. G., Rozen, W. M., Siu, S. K., Stevenson, A. R. L., Stitz, R., & Ho, Y. (2011). Risk Factors and Outcomes for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery: A Single‐Institution Analysis of 1576 Patients. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.