The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complications of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Results of 169 Consecutive Procedures
Abstract
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the gold standard for adrenalectomy. Review of the literature indicates that the rate of intra‐ and postoperative complications is not negligible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications observed in a series of 169 consecutive LAs performed at a same center for a variety of endocrine disorders. Between June 1994 and December 1998 a series of 169 LAs were performed in 159 patients: 149 unilateral LAs and 10 bilateral LAs. There were 98 women and 61 men with a mean age of 49.7 years (range 22–76 years). There were patients with 61 Conn syndrome, 41 with Cushing syndrome, 1 androgen‐producing tumor, 29 pheochromocytomas, and 37 nonfunctioning tumors. Mean tumor size was 32 mm (range 7–110 mm). LA was performed by a transperitoneal flank approach in the lateral decubitus position. Mean operating time was 129 minutes (range 48–300 minutes) for unilateral LA and 228 minutes (range 175–275 minutes) for bilateral LA. There was no mortality. Twelve patients had a significant complication (7.5%): three peritoneal hematomas requiring (in two cases) laparotomy and (in one case) transfusion; one parietal hematoma; three intraoperative bleeding episodes without need for transfusion; one partial infarction of the spleen; one pneumothorax; one capsular effraction of the tumor; and two deep venous thromboses. Eight tumors were malignant at final histology (4.7%), of which four were completely removed laparoscopically. Conversion to open surgery was required in eight cases (5%): for malignancy in four cases, difficulty of dissection in three cases, and pneumothorax in one case. With a mean follow‐up of 26.58 months (range 6–60 months) all patients are disease‐free. We conclude that LA is a safe procedure. With increasing experience the morbidity becomes minor. To avoid complications LA should be converted to open surgery if local invasion is suspected or if there is difficulty with the dissection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lacroix, A., Feelders, R. A., Stratakis, C. A., & Nieman, L. K. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61375-1 · Cited by 1,777
Lenders, J. W., Eisenhofer, G., Mannelli, M., & Pacak, K. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67139-5 · Cited by 1,524
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy–results of 560 procedures in 520 patients
Walz, M. K., Alesina, P. F., Wenger, F. A., Deligiannis, A., Szuczik, E., Petersenn, S., Ommer, A., Groeben, H., Peitgen, K., Janssen, O. E., et al. (2006) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.039 · Cited by 425
Assalia, A., & Gagner, M. (2004) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4738 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Henry, J., Defechereux, T., Raffaelli, M., Lubrano, D., & Gramatica, L.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1342-1346
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2048810310
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Results of 169 Consecutive Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s002680010222
- The paper
- Henry, J., Defechereux, T., Raffaelli, M., Lubrano, D., & Gramatica, L. (2000). Complications of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Results of 169 Consecutive Procedures. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002680010222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.