Cited by 158Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Phase I study of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with solid tumors and multiple myeloma

Tolcher, Anthony W., Patnaik, Amita, Papadopoulos, Kyriakos P., Rasco, Drew W., Becerra, Carlos R., Allred, Alicia J., Orford, Keith, Aktan, Gursel +5 more·2015·Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Purpose To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose of MEK/AKT inhibitor combination of trametinib and afuresertib.Patients and methods Eligibility criteria were advanced solid tumors, 18 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Exclusion criteria included Type 1 diabetes, active GI disease, leptomeningeal disease, or current evidence/risk of retinal venous occlusion/central serous retinopathy. Clinical safety parameters and response were evaluated and analyzed.Results Twenty patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (Grade 2 esophagitis; Grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increased, mucosal inflammation and hypokalemia) were reported at starting dose (1.5 mg trametinib/50 mg afuresertib once daily continuously), exceeding the MTD. Subsequent de-escalation cohorts (1.5 mg/25 mg or 1.0 mg/50 mg trametinib/afuresertib) were defined as MTDs for continuous dosing. Intermittent dosing schedule [1.5 mg trametinib (continuous)/50 mg afuresertib (Days 1-10 every 28 days)] was evaluated and considered tolerable. No patients were enrolled in Phase II. The most common adverse events reported (≥10 % of all patients) included: diarrhea (60 %), dermatitis acneiform (55 %), maculo-papular rash (45 %), fatigue (30 %), dry skin (25 %), nausea (25 %), dyspnea (20 %), and vomiting (20 %). One partial response (BRAF wild-type melanoma) was reported; four patients had stable disease as best response.Conclusion Continuous daily dosing of trametinib/afuresertib combination was poorly tolerated. Evaluation of intermittent dose schedule showed greater tolerability. Given the interest in combination treatment regimens of MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, further study of intermittent dose schedule or combination of trametinib with more selective inhibitors may be warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00280-014-2615-5

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High toxicities of targeting PI3K, AKT or mTOR in combination with MEK inhibitors have prevented their approval for use in human patients.

    “However, high toxicities of targeting PI3K, AKT or mTOR, in combination with MEK inhibitors, have prevented their approval for use in human patients (81–83).”

    From New Horizons in KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer: Dawn After Darkness (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolcher, A. W., Patnaik, A., Papadopoulos, K. P., Rasco, D. W., Becerra, C. R., Allred, A. J., Orford, K., Aktan, G., Ferron-Brady, G., Ibrahim, N., Gauvin, J., Motwani, M., & Cornfeld, M.
Affiliations
  • South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (US)
  • Texas Oncology (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Allred, Alicia J.
Venue
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Published
2014-11-25
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
183-189
ISSN
  • 0344-5704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0843
OpenAlex
W1992880310
Cited by
158
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
trametinib, MEK inhibitors, AKT inhibitors, combination therapy, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, solid tumors, multiple myeloma, intermittent dosing, MAPK signaling, PI3K/Akt signaling, BRAF wild-type melanoma, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Pyrazoles, Pyridones, Pyrimidinones, Thiophenes, Cohort Studies, Tumor Burden, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, MAP Kinase Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Kinase 2, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Early Termination of Clinical Trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review