Cited by 162Plant tissue culture and regenerationTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Selectable marker independent transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred B73 and sorghum P898012 mediated by morphogenic regulators BABY BOOM and WUSCHEL2

Open access
Mookkan, Muruganantham, Nelson-Vasilchik, Kimberly, Hague, Joel, Zhang, Zhanyuan J., Kausch, Albert P.·2017·Plant Cell Reports

Abstract

Discriminatory co-expression of maize BBM and WUS transcriptional factor genes promoted somatic embryogenesis and efficient Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred B73 and sorghum P898012 genotypes without use of a selectable marker gene. The use of morphogenic regulators to overcome barriers in plant transformation is a revolutionary breakthrough for basic plant science and crop applications. Current standard plant transformation systems are bottlenecks for genetic, genomic, and crop improvement studies. We investigated the differential use of co-expression of maize transcription factors BABY BOOM and WUSCHEL2 coupled with a desiccation inducible CRE/lox excision system to enable regeneration of stable transgenic recalcitrant maize inbred B73 and sorghum P898012 without a chemical selectable marker. The PHP78891 expression cassette contains CRE driven by the drought inducible maize RAB17M promoter with lox P sites which bracket the CRE, WUS, and BBM genes. A constitutive maize UBI M promoter directs a ZsGreen GFP expression cassette as a reporter outside of the excision sites and provides transient, transgenic, and developmental analysis. This was coupled with evidence for molecular integration and analysis of stable integration and desiccation inducible CRE-mediated excision. Agrobacterium-mediated transgenic introduction of this vector showed transient expression of GFP and induced somatic embryogenesis in maize B73 and sorghum P898012 explants. Subjection to desiccation stress in tissue culture enabled the excision of CRE, WUS, and BBM, leaving the UBI M::GFP cassette and allowing subsequent plant regeneration and GFP expression analysis. Stable GFP expression was observed in the early and late somatic embryos, young shoots, vegetative plant organs, and pollen. Transgene integration and expression of GFP positive T0 plants were also analyzed using PCR and Southern blots. Progeny segregation analysis of primary events confirmed correlation between functional GFP expression and presence of the GFP transgene in T1 plants generated from self pollinations, indicating good transgene inheritance. This study confirms and extends the use of morphogenic regulators to overcome transformation barriers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00299-017-2169-1

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overexpression of developmental regulators such as the maize BABY BOOM (BBM) and WUSCHEL 2 (WUS2) genes has increased the transformation efficiency in sorghum, rice, and sugarcane.

    “Overexpression of developmental regulators such as the maize BABY BOOM (BBM) and WUSCHEL 2 (WUS2) genes has increased the transformation efficiency in sorghum, rice, and sugarcane (Lowe et al., 2016;Mookkan et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mookkan, M., Nelson-Vasilchik, K., Hague, J., Zhang, Z. J., & Kausch, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Zhanyuan J.
  • Kausch, Albert P.
Venue
Plant Cell Reports
Published
2017-07-05
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1477-1491
ISSN
  • 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-203X
OpenAlex
W2732418005
Cited by
162
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation Plant Genome (1444478)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
marker-free transformation, somatic embryogenesis, baby boom, desiccation stress, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, transgene integration, transgene inheritance, GFP reporter, plant regeneration
MeSH terms
Zea mays, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Plant Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Transformation, Genetic, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plants, Genetically Modified, Sorghum, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Droughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review