Cited by 2,544Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMRI in cancer diagnosis

Prostate imaging reporting and data system Version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2

Turkbey, Baris, Rosenkrantz, Andrew B., Haider, Masoom A., Padhani, Anwar R., Villeirs, Geert, Macura, Katarzyna J., Tempany, Clare M., Choyke, Peter L. +6 more·2019·European Urology

Abstract

The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) was developed with a consensus-based process using a combination of published data, and expert observations and opinions. In the short time since its release, numerous studies have validated the value of PI-RADS v2 but, as expected, have also identified a number of ambiguities and limitations, some of which have been documented in the literature with potential solutions offered. To address these issues, the PI-RADS Steering Committee, again using a consensus-based process, has recommended several modifications to PI-RADS v2, maintaining the framework of assigning scores to individual sequences and using these scores to derive an overall assessment category. This updated version, described in this article, is termed PI-RADS v2.1. It is anticipated that the adoption of these PI-RADS v2.1 modifications will improve inter-reader variability and simplify PI-RADS assessment of prostate magnetic resonance imaging even further. Research on the value and limitations on all components of PI-RADS v2.1 is strongly encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Haider, M. A., Padhani, A. R., Villeirs, G., Macura, K. J., Tempany, C. M., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Margolis, D. J., Thoeny, H. C., Verma, S., Barentsz, J., & Weinreb, J. C.
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (GB)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
340-351
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922071185
Cited by
2,544
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 378 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 421 · 2023: 389 · 2022: 308 · 2021: 289 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
38.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
PI-RADS v2.1, prostate MRI, prostate cancer, reporting and data system, inter-reader variability, prostate imaging
MeSH terms
Data Systems, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Consensus, Image-Guided Biopsy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review