Cited by 136Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

“Black Bone” MRI: a potential alternative to CT with three-dimensional reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis

Eley, Karen A., Watt-Smith, Stephen R., Sheerin, Fintan, Golding, Stephen J.·2014·European Radiology

Abstract

Objectives To determine the potential of novel gradient echo parameters, "Black Bone" MRI as an alternative to CT in the identification of normal and prematurely fused cranial sutures both in 2D and 3D imaging.Methods Thirteen children with a clinical diagnosis of craniosynostosis underwent "Black Bone" MRI in addition to routine cranial CT. "Black Bone" datasets were compared to CT and clinical findings. "Black Bone" imaging was subsequently used to develop 3D reformats of the craniofacial skeleton to enhance further visualisation of the cranial sutures.Results Patent cranial sutures were consistently identified on "Black Bone" MRI as areas of increased signal intensity. In children with craniosynostosis the affected suture was absent, whilst the remaining patent sutures could be visualised, consistent with CT and clinical findings. Segmentation of the "Black Bone" MRI datasets was successful with both threshold and volume rendering techniques. The cranial sutures, where patent, could be visualised throughout their path.Conclusions Patent cranial sutures appear as areas of increased signal intensity on "Black Bone" MRI distinct from the cranial bone, demonstrating considerable clinical potential as a non-ionising alternative to CT in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis.Key points • Patent cranial sutures appear hyperintense on "Black Bone" MRI • Prematurely fused cranial sutures are distinct from patent sutures • Minimal soft tissue contrast permits 3D-rendered imaging of the craniofacial skeleton.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-014-3286-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eley, K. A., Watt-Smith, S. R., Sheerin, F., & Golding, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Eley, Karen A.
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2014-07-20
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2417-2426
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W1964200564
Cited by
136
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Radiological Society of North America
  • Newlife the Charity for Disabled Children
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2013-14-008)
  • AO Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
black bone MRI, craniosynostosis, cranial sutures, premature suture fusion, gradient-echo imaging, volume rendering
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review