Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis

Open access
Singh, Siddharth, Venkatesh, Sudhakar K., Loomba, Rohit, Wang, Zhen, Sirlin, Claude, Chen, Jun, Yin, Meng, Miller, Frank H., Low, Russell N., Hassanein, Tarek, Godfrey, Edmund M., Asbach, Patrick, Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Lomas, David J., Talwalkar, Jayant A., Ehman, Richard L.·2016·European Radiology

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWe conducted an individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis on diagnostic accuracy of MRE to detect fibrosis stage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).MethodsThrough a systematic literature search, we identified studies of MRE (at 60–62.5 Hz) for staging fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, using liver biopsy as gold standard, and contacted study authors for IPD. Through pooled analysis, we calculated the cluster-adjusted AUROC, sensitivity and specificity of MRE for any (≥stage 1), significant (≥stage 2) and advanced (≥stage 3) fibrosis and cirrhosis (stage 4).ResultsWe included nine studies with 232 patients with NAFLD (mean age, 51 ± 13 years; 37.5 % males; mean BMI, 33.5 ± 6.7 kg/m2; interval between MRE and biopsy <1 year, 98.3 %). Fibrosis stage distribution (stage 0/1/2/3/4) was 33.6, 32.3, 10.8, 12.9 and 10.4 %, respectively. Mean AUROC (and 95 % CIs) for diagnosis of any, significant or advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 0.86 (0.82–0.90), 0.87 (0.82–0.93), 0.90 (0.84–0.94) and 0.91 (0.76–0.95), respectively. Similar diagnostic performance was observed in stratified analysis based on sex, obesity and degree of inflammation.ConclusionsMRE has high diagnostic accuracy for detection of fibrosis in NAFLD, independent of BMI and degree of inflammation.Key points• MRE has high diagnostic accuracy for detection of fibrosis in NAFLD. • BMI does not significantly affect accuracy of MRE in NAFLD. • Inflammation had no significant influence on MRE performance in NAFLD for fibrosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-015-3949-z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Singh, S., Venkatesh, S. K., Loomba, R., Wang, Z., Sirlin, C., Chen, J., Yin, M., Miller, F. H., Low, R. N., Hassanein, T., Godfrey, E. M., Asbach, P., Murad, M. H., Lomas, D. J., Talwalkar, J. A., & Ehman, R. L.
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2015-08-28
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1431-1440
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W1917816261
Cited by
252
References
3
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.