Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis

Open access
Bazot, M., Bharwani, N., Huchon, C., Kinkel, K., Cunha, T. M., Guerra, A., Manganaro, L., Buñesch, L., Kido, A., Togashi, K., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Rockall, A. G.·2017·European Radiology

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition of unknown aetiology that primarily affects women of reproductive age. The accepted first-line imaging modality is pelvic ultrasound. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly performed as an additional investigation in complex cases and for surgical planning. There is currently no international consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI protocols or reporting criteria. Our aim was to develop clinical guidelines for MRI evaluation of pelvic endometriosis based on literature evidence and consensus expert opinion. This work was performed by a group of radiologists from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), experts in gynaecological imaging and a gynaecologist expert in methodology. The group discussed indications for MRI, technical requirements, patient preparation, MRI protocols and criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis on MRI. The expert panel proposed a final recommendation for each criterion using Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 levels of evidence. KEY POINTS: • This report provides guidelines for MRI in endometriosis. • Minimal and optimal MRI acquisition protocols are provided. • Recommendations are proposed for patient preparation, best MRI sequences and reporting criteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Bazot, M., Bharwani, N., Huchon, C., Kinkel, K., Cunha, T. M., Guerra, A., Manganaro, L., Buñesch, L., Kido, A., Togashi, K., Thomassin-Naggara, I., & Rockall, A. G.
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
2765-2775
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2559987928
Cited by
346
References
74
FWCI
22.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z
The paper
Bazot, M., Bharwani, N., Huchon, C., Kinkel, K., Cunha, T. M., Guerra, A., Manganaro, L., Buñesch, L., Kido, A., Togashi, K., Thomassin-Naggara, I., & Rockall, A. G. (2017). European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.