The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) has important advantages compared with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS): it is less invasive, is cost-effective, is a familiar and well-accepted approach, and anesthesia is not required. We compared the accuracy of TVUS and TRUS for diagnosing rectal wall involvement in patients presenting with histologically proved deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: Prospective study of 134 patients with histologically proved DIE underwent preoperative investigations using both TVUS and TRUS. The radiologist (TVUS) and sonographer (TRUS) were unaware of the clinical findings but knew that DIE was suspected. RESULTS: DIE was confirmed histologically for all the patients. A rectal wall involvement was histologically proved for 75 patients (56%). For the diagnosis of infiltration of the intestinal wall, TVUS and TRUS, respectively, had a sensitivity of 90.7% and 96.0%, a specificity of 96.5% and 100.0%, a positive predictive value of 97.1% and 100.0% and a negative predictive value of 88.9% and 95.2%. CONCLUSIONS: TVUS and TRUS have similar degrees of accuracy for predicting intestinal involvement. TVUS must be the first-line imaging process to perform for patients presenting with clinically suspected DIE. The question for the coming years is to define if it is necessary for TRUS to be carried out systematically in cases of clinically suspected DIE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koninckx, P. R., Meuleman, C., Demeyere, S., Lesaffre, E., & Cornillie, F. J. (1991) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54244-7 · Cited by 849
Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications
Fauconnier, A., & Chapron, C. (2005) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi029 · Cited by 522 · cited 2×
“sible for pelvic pain symptoms (Fauconnier and Chapron, 2005), and the type of pain is related to location of the DIE lesions (Fauconnier et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationUse of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis
Fedele, L., Bianchi, S., Zanconato, G., Portuese, A., & Raffaelli, R. (2001) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01759-3 · Cited by 290
Vercellini, P., Pietropaolo, G., De Giorgi, O., Pasin, R., Chiodini, A., & Crosignani, P. G. (2005) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.083 · Cited by 197 · cited 1×
“Management of DIE can be either medical (Igarashi et al., 1998; Fedele et al., 2000; Fedele et al., 2001; Hefler et al., 2005; Vercellini et al., 2005; Razzi et al., 2007) or surgical (Urbach et al., 1998; Chapron et al., 2003b; Darai et al., 2005; Vignali et al., 2005; & The Author 2008.”
BackgroundChopin, N., Vieira, M., Borghese, B., Foulot, H., Dousset, B., Coste, J., Mignon, A., Fauconnier, A., & Chapron, C. (2005) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.015 · Cited by 154
Self-citationEfficacy of vaginal danazol treatment in women with recurrent deeply infiltrating endometriosis
Razzi, S., Luisi, S., Calonaci, F., Altomare, A., Bocchi, C., & Petraglia, F. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.077 · Cited by 100
Igarashi, M., Iizuka, M., Abe, Y., & Ibuki, Y. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.7.1952 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment
Vercellini, P., Viganò, P., Somigliana, E., & Fedele, L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2013.255 · Cited by 1,940
Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis
Chapron, C., Marcellin, L., Borghese, B., & Santulli, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationGuerriero, S., Condous, G., van den Bosch, T., Valentin, L., Leone, F. P. G., Van Schoubroeck, D., Exacoustos, C., Installé, A. J. F., Martins, W. P., Abrao, M. S., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15955 · Cited by 900
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P. M., Farquhar, C., Johnson, N., & Hull, M. L. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009591.pub2 · Cited by 538
Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management
Abrao, M. S., Petraglia, F., Falcone, T., Keckstein, J., Osuga, Y., & Chapron, C. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv003 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Piketty, M., Chopin, N., Dousset, B., Millischer-Bellaische, A.-E., Roseau, G., Leconte, M., Borghese, B., & Chapron, C.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-12-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 602-607
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2123731923
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/den405
- The paper
- Piketty, M., Chopin, N., Dousset, B., Millischer-Bellaische, A.-E., Roseau, G., Leconte, M., Borghese, B., & Chapron, C. (2008). Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
