Cited by 177Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Record densities of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs

Open access
Green, S. J., Côté, I. M.·2009·Coral Reefs

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00338-008-0446-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lionfish in the Bahamas prey mostly on fishes (78% by volume), including 41 species from 21 families.

    “Bahamian studies documented lionfish at 5 to 177 times higher densities than in their native range (Grubich et al. 2009), capable of reducing reef fish recruitment by 79% from experimental patch reefs, and preying mostly on fishes (78% by volume), including 41 species from 21 families (Albins & Hixon 2008, Green & Cote 2009, Morris & Akins 2009).”

    From Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes (2011) · cites this paper as Green & Cote 2009

    The paper’s main text reports lionfish densities in the Bahamas and cites a 79% reduction in native-fish recruitment on experimental reefs. It does not address prey composition, the 78% by-volume figure, or the count of 41 species from 21 families (searched for those figures and lionfish diet). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Whitfield PE, Hare JA, David AW, Harter SL, Munoz RC, Addison CM (2007) Abundance estimates of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the Western North Atlantic. Biol Invasions 9:53-64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, S. J., & Côté, I. M.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Green, S. J.
Venue
Coral Reefs
Published
2008-11-25
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
107-107
ISSN
  • 0722-4028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0975
OpenAlex
W2032129202
Cited by
177
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Coral Reefs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
Indo-Pacific lionfish, Pterois, invasive species, population density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review