The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantitative study of three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms
Open accessAbstract
A neural network particle finding algorithm and a new four-frame predictive tracking algorithm are proposed for three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT). A quantitative comparison of these and other algorithms commonly used in three-dimensional LPT is presented. Weighted averaging, one-dimensional and two-dimensional Gaussian fitting, and the neural network scheme are considered for determining particle centers in digital camera images. When the signal to noise ratio is high, the one-dimensional Gaussian estimation scheme is shown to achieve a good combination of accuracy and efficiency, while the neural network approach provides greater accuracy when the images are noisy. The effect of camera placement on both the yield and accuracy of three-dimensional particle positions is investigated, and it is shown that at least one camera must be positioned at a large angle with respect to the other cameras to minimize errors. Finally, the problem of tracking particles in time is studied. The nearest neighbor algorithm is compared with a three-frame predictive algorithm and two four-frame algorithms. These four algorithms are applied to particle tracks generated by direct numerical simulation both with and without a method to resolve tracking conflicts. The new four-frame predictive algorithm with no conflict resolution is shown to give the best performance. Finally, the best algorithms are verified to work in a real experimental environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics
Adrian, R. J. (1991) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401 · Cited by 3,405
Cited by
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 · Cited by 3,063
Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension.
Mestre, H., Tithof, J., Du, T., Song, W., Peng, W., Sweeney, A. M., Olveda, G., Thomas, J. H., Nedergaard, M., & Kelley, D. H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07318-3 · Cited by 1,110
Cerebrospinal fluid influx drives acute ischemic tissue swelling
Mestre, H., Du, T., Sweeney, A. M., Liu, G., Samson, A. J., Peng, W., Mortensen, K. N., Stæger, F. F., Bork, P. A. R., Bashford, L., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax7171 · Cited by 494
Turbulence drives microscale patches of motile phytoplankton
Durham, W. M., Climent, E., Barry, M., De Lillo, F., Boffetta, G., Cencini, M., & Stocker, R. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3148 · Cited by 324
Oscillatory Flows Induced by Microorganisms Swimming in Two Dimensions
Guasto, J. S., Johnson, K. A., & Gollub, J. P. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.168102 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouellette, N. T., Xu, H., & Bodenschatz, E.
- Venue
- Experiments in Fluids
- Published
- 2005-11-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-313
- ISSN
- 0723-4864 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1114
- OpenAlex
- W2067472975
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative study of three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00348-005-0068-7
- The paper
- Ouellette, N. T., Xu, H., & Bodenschatz, E. (2006). A quantitative study of three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms. Experiments in Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0068-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.