Cited by 78Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Color image encryption scheme based on fractional Hartley transform and chaotic substitution–permutation

Kaur, Gurpreet, Agarwal, Rekha, Patidar, Vinod·2022·The Visual Computer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00371-021-02066-w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kaur, G., Agarwal, R., & Patidar, V.
Affiliations
  • Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN)
  • Sir Padampat Singhania University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaur, Gurpreet
Venue
The Visual Computer
Published
2021-01-22
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
1027-1050
ISSN
  • 0178-2789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2315
OpenAlex
W3125371001
Cited by
78
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Visual Computer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
color image encryption, piecewise linear chaotic map, optical image processing, secret key, key sensitivity, attack resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review