Cited by 150Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

A color image encryption and decryption scheme based on extended DNA coding and fractional-order 5D hyper-chaotic system

Meng, Fan-Qi, Wu, Gang·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124413

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, F.-Q., & Wu, G.
Affiliations
Yancheng Teachers University (CN)
Corresponding author
Meng, Fan-Qi
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
254
Pages
124413
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399557610
Cited by
144
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 12
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
color image encryption, image decryption, chaotic sequences, permutation and diffusion, image security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review