CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 351Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions.

Open access
M., Davey, M., Huddleston, K., Sperber, P., Braconnot, F., Bryan, D., Chen, R., Colman, C., Cooper +28 more·2002·Climate Dynamics
DOI 10.1007/s00382-001-0188-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00382-001-0188-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These coupled climate model biases have received much attention but seen little improvement.

    “These biases have received much attention but seen little improvement (Davey et al., 2002;Richter and Xie, 2008;Richter et al., 2014b;Giarolla et al., 2015;Zuidema et al., 2016b).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Davey et al., 2002

  • The conflicting results from CGCMs are easily understood because the strength of equatorial coupled variability depends entirely on the ability of the model to simulate the Bjerknes feedback and its seasonality correctly, both of which depend on the climatology of the Atlantic, which is poorly simulated by such models.

    “The conflicting results from CGCMs is also easily understood, since the strength of equatorial coupled variability depends entirely on the ability of the model to simulate the Bjerknes feedback and its seasonality correctly, both of which depend on the climatology of the Atlantic, which is poorly simulated by such models (Davey et al. 2002).”

    From Understanding equatorial atlantic interannual variability (2007) · cites this paper as Davey et al. 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
M., D., M., H., K., S., P., B., F., B., D., C., R., C., C., C., U., C., P., D., D., D., L., F., G., F., C., G., T., H., M., J., M., K., A., K., T., K., M., L., Treut, H. L., T., L., S., M., C., M., S., P., E., R., L., T., A., V., R., V., B., W., W., W., I., Y., J., Y., S., Y., S., Z., & G., M.
Affiliations
  • Met Office (GB)
  • NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (US)
  • Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR)
Venue
Climate Dynamics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
403-420
ISSN
  • 0930-7575 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0894
DOI
10.1007/s00382-001-0188-6
OpenAlex
W2139831266
Cited by
351
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 24
FWCI
16.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Climate Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
coupled ocean-atmosphere model, model evaluation, sea surface temperature, wind stress, upper ocean temperature, interannual variability, seasonal cycle, flux adjustment, equatorial Pacific, Niño 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review