Cited by 33Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Robot deployment in long-term care: Case study on using a mobile robot to support physiotherapy

Open access
Gerling, K., Hebesberger, D., Dondrup, C., Körtner, T., Hanheide, M.·2016·Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems in industrialized countries face the challenge of providing care for a growing number of elderly people. Information technology has the possibility of facilitating this process by providing support for nursing staff and improving the well-being of the elderly through a variety of support systems. OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the challenges that arise from the deployment of technology in care settings; however, the integration of technology into care is one of the core determinants of successful support. This article presents the challenges and options associated with the integration of technology into care using the example of a mobile robot to support physiotherapy for elderly people with cognitive impairment in the European project Spatio-Temporal Representations and Activities for Cognitive Control in Long-Term Scenarios (STRANDS). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This article presents the technical challenges associated with the introduction of robots in the context of care as well as the perspectives of physiotherapists involved and an overview of information and experiences gained. It is hoped that this will provide useful information for the work of researchers and practitioners wishing to integrate robotic aids into the caregiving process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00391-016-1065-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impact assessment was based on qualitative analysis in the context of the care deployment within the STRANDS project.

    “To assess the impact of individual failures, we base our assessment of a qualitative analysis in the context of the care deployment within the STRANDS project [24,33,34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Hebesberger D, Körtner T, Hanheide M et al (2015) What do staff in eldercare want a robot for? An assessment of potential tasks and user requirements for a long-term deployment. Workshop Bridging user needs to deployed applications of service robots at the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  2. [11]Hebesberger D Dondrup C Körtner T Lessons learned from the deployment of a long-term autonomous robot as a companion in physical therapy for older adults with dementia. Proceedings of HRI 2016 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerling, K., Hebesberger, D., Dondrup, C., Körtner, T., & Hanheide, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • Akademie für Altersforschung am Haus der Barmherzigkeit (AT)
Corresponding author
Gerling, K.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
Published
2016-06
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
288-297
ISSN
  • 0948-6704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1269
OpenAlex
W2413810077
Cited by
33
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
EU ICT (Project 600623 ‘STRANDS’)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
mobile robots, robot deployment, long-term care, elderly care, physiotherapy, cognitive impairment, nursing staff perspectives, assistive robotics
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Europe, Long-Term Care, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Social Support, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Utilization Review, Needs Assessment, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review