Cited by 27Cardiovascular Effects of ExerciseAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation and long-term sports practice: epidemiology and mechanisms

Wernhart, S., Halle, M.·2015·Clinical Research in Cardiology

Abstract

Background Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia of the heart and is considered to have a higher prevalence in athletes, especially in endurance sports. Methods We conducted an extensive literature research in pubmed using the key words s ports and atrial fibrillation. Results The majority of studies have methodological limitations due to different inclusion criteria, such as age, type of sport, training level as well as statistical bias. The inconsistency of data is reflected by the considerable range of AF occurrence, spanning from 0.3 to 12.8 %. Conclusions We consider it reasonable to separate a study population into sedentary individuals, leisure time sportsmen/women and elite athletes. A distinction between the categories may be achieved through a combination of exercise history, capacity (e.g. MET hours/week, e.g. VO2max) and competitive results. Since there is a large span in the analyzed age groups (24-84 years), we claim that the focus should be laid upon the 45- to 65-year-olds due to a sound detection rate of true positives. Finally, we discuss ways to increase the detection rate of paroxysmal AF and comment on new therapeutic options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00392-014-0805-0

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of AF in competitive athletes ranges from 0.3% to approximately 13%, differing according to age and modality of exercise training.

    “The prevalence of AF in competitive athletes ranges from 0.3% to approximately 13%, and differs according to the age and the modality of exercise training [13,25,26,27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wernhart, S., & Halle, M.
Affiliations
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Wernhart, S.
Venue
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2014-12-25
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
369-379
ISSN
  • 1861-0684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-0692
OpenAlex
W2018587803
Cited by
27
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
lone atrial fibrillation, athletes, endurance sports, prevalence, elite athletes, sedentary individuals, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, detection rate, atrial fibrillation mechanisms, antiarrhythmic therapy
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Germany, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Factors, Sports, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review