Cited by 27Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Running, esophageal acid reflux, and atrial fibrillation: A chain of events linked by evidence from separate medical literatures

Open access
Swanson, Don R.·2008·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

Using a previously described approach to generating novel medical hypotheses, this paper shows how two separate medical literatures taken together can suggest new information not apparent in either literature alone. Many studies have demonstrated that aerobic exercise in healthy people can induce esophageal acidic reflux that increases with the duration and intensity of exercise. Separately, independently of exercise, it has been shown that, in patients with gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal acid exposure can lead to atrial fibrillation (AF) and to other heart dysrhythmias. The two arguments together suggest that a regimen of excessive exercise may be conducive to AF mediated by acid reflux, an implicit, but unpublished, hypothesis. Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to treat gastroesophageal reflux. Remarkably, several small clinical trials of these drugs have been shown also to reduce symptoms and frequency of AF episodes in patients with comorbid acid reflux. Plausible mechanisms have been suggested. These small-scale tests in a highly restricted population may be of particular interest in the light of a possible exercise-reflux-AF causal chain of events in a broader population of athletes. Because the minimum degree of esophageal acidity exposure required to induce AF is unknown, further tests of proton pump inhibitors for that purpose are therefore merited without regard to any known prior reflux in a population of runners with lone AF. The prospect of reducing AF…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.02.017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, Don R.
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
178-185
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046006429
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM007292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal acid exposure, aerobic exercise, runners, athletes, proton pump inhibitors, cardiac arrhythmias, lone atrial fibrillation, hypothesis generation
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical, Running, Exercise, Databases, Bibliographic, Proton Pump Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review