Cited by 4Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchNutritional Studies and Diet

Overall diet quality and risk of recurrence and progression of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

Open access
Oskarsson, Viktor, Sadr-Azodi, Omid, Discacciati, Andrea, Orsini, Nicola, Wolk, Alicja·2018·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

An incident episode of acute pancreatitis is often followed by recurrent attacks and/or progression to chronic pancreatitis, especially if the etiology is non-gallstone-related. We examined whether overall diet quality influences the natural history of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis. Three hundred and eighty-six individuals (born 1914–1952) were included in a prospective study, all of whom had an incident diagnosis of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis in the Swedish National Patient Register between 1998 and 2013. Participants were already enrolled in two population-based cohorts and had completed a food frequency questionnaire in 1997. Overall diet quality was calculated using a recommended food score (RFS), which was based on 25 food items. Post-diagnosis follow-up was conducted throughout 2014 for recurrence of acute pancreatitis and/or progression to chronic pancreatic disease (including cancer). Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox models. During 1859 person-years of follow-up, 23.3% of the study population (n = 90) developed recurrent or progressive pancreatic disease. An inverse association was observed between the RFS and risk of recurrent and progressive pancreatic disease after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratio for each 2-unit increase 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.01) (P overall association = 0.06). However, the association became weaker and was not statistically significant after adjustment for other potential confounders, including alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking (P overall association = 0.27). In this prospective study of individuals with non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis, there was no clear association between overall diet quality and risk of recurrent and progressive pancreatic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-017-1526-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of three RCTs with 362 patients showed that a non-liquid soft or solid diet did not increase pain recurrence after refeeding compared with a clear liquid diet, and reduced hospitalization with a pooled mean difference of -1.05 days.

    “the non-liquid soft or solid diet did not”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [203]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1]Lankisch PG Apte M Banks PA Acute pancreatitis Lancet 2015 386 85 96 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8 25616312 · DOI
  2. [2]Sankaran SJ Xiao AY Wu LM Windsor JA Forsmark CE Petrov MS Frequency of progression from acute to chronic pancreatitis and risk factors: a meta-analysis Gastroenterology 2015 149 1490–1500.e1 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.066 26299411 · DOI
  3. [3]Lund H Tønnesen H Tønnesen MH Olsen O Long-term recurrence and death rates after acute pancreatitis Scand J Gastroenterol 2006 41 234 238 10.1080/00365520510024133 16484129 · DOI
  4. [4]Pelli H Lappalainen-Lehto R Piironen A Sand J Nordback I Risk factors for recurrent acute alcohol-associated pancreatitis: a prospective analysis Scand J Gastroenterol 2008 43 614 621 10.1080/00365520701843027 18415757 · DOI
  5. [5]Lankisch PG Breuer N Bruns A Weber-Dany B Lowenfels AB Maisonneuve P Natural history of acute pancreatitis: a long-term population-based study Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 2797 2805 10.1038/ajg.2009.405 19603011 · DOI
  6. [6]Yadav D O’Connell M Papachristou GI Natural history following the first attack of acute pancreatitis Am J Gastroenterol 2012 107 1096 1103 10.1038/ajg.2012.126 22613906 · DOI
  7. [7]Bertilsson S Swärd P Kalaitzakis E Factors that affect disease progression after first attack of acute pancreatitis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015 13 1662–1669.e3 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.012 25911118 · DOI
  8. [8]Ahmed Ali U Issa Y Hagenaars JC Risk of recurrent pancreatitis and progression to chronic pancreatitis after a first episode of acute pancreatitis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016 14 738 746 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.040 26772149 · DOI
  9. [9]Cavestro GM Leandro G Di Leo M A single-centre prospective, cohort study of the natural history of acute pancreatitis Dig Liver Dis 2015 47 205 210 10.1016/j.dld.2014.11.003 25475611 · DOI
  10. [10]Yadav D Lowenfels AB The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer Gastroenterology 2013 144 1252 1261 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068 23622135 PMC3662544 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [11]Oskarsson V Sadr-Azodi O Orsini N Andrén-Sandberg Å Wolk A Vegetables, fruit and risk of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis: a population-based prospective cohort study Gut 2013 62 1187 1192 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302521 22740517 · DOI
  12. [12]Oskarsson V Sadr-Azodi O Orsini N Andrén-Sandberg Å Wolk A High dietary glycemic load increases the risk of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 12 676 682 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.058 24100113 · DOI
  13. [13]Oskarsson V Orsini N Sadr-Azodi O Wolk A Fish consumption and risk of non-gallstone-related acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study Am J Clin Nutr 2015 101 72 78 10.3945/ajcn.113.076174 25527752 · DOI
  14. [14]Prizment AE Jensen EH Hopper AM Virnig BA Anderson KE Risk factors for pancreatitis in older women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study Ann Epidemiol 2015 25 544 548 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.12.010 25656921 PMC4457556 · DOI
  15. [15]Setiawan VW Pandol SJ Porcel J Dietary factors reduce risk of acute pancreatitis in a large multiethnic cohort Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017 15 257–265.e3 27609706 PMC5241169
  16. [16]Yang H Wang L Shi YH Risk factors of acute pancreatitis in the elderly Chinese population: a population-based cross-sectional study J Dig Dis 2014 15 501 507 10.1111/1751-2980.12168 24957953 · DOI
  17. [17]Kant AK Schatzkin A Graubard BI Schairer C A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women JAMA 2000 283 2109 2115 10.1001/jama.283.16.2109 10791502 · DOI
  18. [18]Michels KB Wolk A A prospective study of variety of healthy foods and mortality in women Int J Epidemiol 2002 31 847 854 10.1093/ije/31.4.847 12177033 · DOI
  19. [19]Messerer M Håkansson N Wolk A Akesson A Dietary supplement use and mortality in a cohort of Swedish men Br J Nutr 2008 99 626 631 10.1017/S0007114507812049 17764599 · DOI
  20. [20]Messerer M Johansson SE Wolk A The validity of questionnaire-based micronutrient intake estimates is increased by including dietary supplement use in Swedish men J Nutr 2004 134 1800 1805 10.1093/jn/134.7.1800 15226472 · DOI
  21. [21]Stackelberg O Björck M Larsson SC Orsini N Wolk A Fruit and vegetable consumption with risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm Circulation 2013 128 795 802 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000728 23960255 · DOI
  22. [22]Wolk A Larsson SC Johansson JE Ekman P Long-term fatty fish consumption and renal cell carcinoma incidence in women JAMA 2006 296 1371 1376 10.1001/jama.296.11.1371 16985229 · DOI
  23. [23]Larsson SC Andersson SO Johansson JE Wolk A Cultured milk, yogurt, and dairy intake in relation to bladder cancer risk in a prospective study of Swedish women and men Am J Clin Nutr 2008 88 1083 1087 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.1083 18842797 · DOI
  24. [24]Ludvigsson JF Andersson E Ekbom A External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register BMC Public Health 2011 11 450 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450 21658213 PMC3142234 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [25]Razavi D Ljung R Lu Y Andrén-Sandberg Å Lindblad M Reliability of acute pancreatitis diagnosis coding in a national patient register: a validation study in Sweden Pancreatology 2011 11 525 532 10.1159/000331773 22094886 · DOI
  26. [26]Lindkvist B Appelros S Regnér S Manjer J A prospective cohort study on risk of acute pancreatitis related to serum triglycerides, cholesterol and fasting glucose Pancreatology 2012 12 317 324 10.1016/j.pan.2012.05.002 22898632 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [27]Vittinghoff E McCulloch CE Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression Am J Epidemiol 2007 165 710 718 10.1093/aje/kwk052 17182981 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [28]White IR Royston P Wood AM Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice Stat Med 2011 30 377 399 10.1002/sim.4067 21225900 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [31]White IR Carlin JB Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values Stat Med 2010 29 2920 2931 10.1002/sim.3944 20842622 · DOI
  30. [32]Vipperla K Papachristou GI Easler J Muddana V Slivka A Whitcomb DC Yadav D Risk of and factors associated with readmission after a sentinel attack of acute pancreatitis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 12 1911 1919 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.035 24815327 · DOI
  31. [33]Whitlock TL Repas K Tignor A Conwell D Singh V Banks PA Wu BU Early readmission in acute pancreatitis: incidence and risk factors Am J Gastroenterol 2010 105 2492 2497 10.1038/ajg.2010.234 20531398 · DOI
  32. [34]Johnson C Lévy P Detection of gallstones in acute pancreatitis: when and how? Pancreatology 2010 10 27 32 10.1159/000224147 20299820 · DOI
  33. [35]Patja K Hakala SM Boström G Nordgren P Haglund M Trends of tobacco use in Sweden and Finland: do differences in tobacco policy relate to tobacco use? Scand J Public Health 2009 37 153 160 10.1177/1403494808100277 19164430 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oskarsson, V., Sadr-Azodi, O., Discacciati, A., Orsini, N., & Wolk, A.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Oskarsson, Viktor
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2017-08-30
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
2537-2545
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W2752189087
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • The Swedish Research Council/Committee for Infrastructure (dnr. 2008-5947, dnr. 2011-6262)
  • Karolinska Institutet (dnr. 2368/10-221, dnr. 3023/11-225)
  • The Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS-501861)
  • The Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland (DLL-518471)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
diet quality, recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, disease progression, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Pancreatitis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review