Cited by 16Skin and Cellular Biology ResearchDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Human keratinocyte caspase-14 expression is altered in human epidermal 3D models by dexamethasone and by natural products used in cosmetics

Kataoka, Saori, Hattori, Kenji, Date, Akira, Tamura, Hiroomi·2013·Archives of Dermatological Research

Abstract

Caspase-14 is a cysteinyl-aspartate-specific proteinase that is specifically expressed in epidermal keratinocytes. Dysregulation of caspase-14 expression is implicated in impaired skin barrier formation. To elucidate the regulation of caspase-14 in differentiated keratinocytes, we characterized the expression of caspase-14 in normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) and two types of three-dimensional (3D) human epidermis culture models, EPI-200 and EPI-201, via RT-PCR and immunoblot analyses. Caspase-14 expression was absent in subconfluent NHEKs, but was present in confluent NHEKs as well as those induced to differentiate by calcium. Caspase-14 expression levels in the 3D epidermis models were almost equal to that in the Ca(2+)-treated differentiated NHEKs. Despite the presence of caspase-14 expression in these models, caspase-14 activity was found only in the mature 3D skin model, EPI-200. This was confirmed by detection of a 17 kDa cleaved fragment of caspase-14 present only in the EPI-200 model. Since glucocorticoid (GC) receptor is required for skin barrier competence, we investigated whether the GC dexamethasone (Dex) and various natural components of common skin moisturizers affect caspase-14 expression in keratinocytes. Dex decreased caspase-14 expression in undifferentiated, but not differentiated, NHEKs. Conversely, Dex increased caspase-14 expression in both 3D skin models, although it did not alter caspase protease activity. Similar to treatment with Dex, trea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00403-013-1359-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kataoka, S., Hattori, K., Date, A., & Tamura, H.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Hyogo University of Health Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Tamura, Hiroomi
Venue
Archives of Dermatological Research
Published
2013-04-21
Volume
305
Issue
8
Pages
683-689
ISSN
  • 0003-9187 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-3696
  • 1432-069X
OpenAlex
W2005683772
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Dermatological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Procter and Gamble
  • Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24500996)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
CASP14, keratinocytes, epidermal differentiation, dexamethasone, glucocorticoids, skin barrier, 3D skin model, calcium-induced differentiation, cosmetic ingredients, emollients
MeSH terms
Biological Products, Cell Line, Cosmetics, Dexamethasone, Epidermis, Humans, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, RNA, Messenger, Keratinocytes, Caspase 14

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review