Medicinal plants and their natural components as future drugs for the treatment of burn wounds: an integrative review
Abstract
Burn wound healing is a complicated process including inflammation, re-epithelialization, granulation, neovascularization and wound contraction. Several biochemicals are involved in burn healing process including antioxidants, cytokines and liver and kidney damage biomarkers. Although several preparations are available for the management of burn wound, there is still a necessity of researching for efficacious medicine. The aim of the present study was to evaluate herbal preparations and their phytochemical constituents for burn wound management. For this purpose, electronic databases including Pubmed, Scirus, Scopus and Cochrane library were searched from 1966 to July 2013 for in vitro, in vivo or clinical studies which examined the effect of any herbal preparation on different types of burn wound. Only 3 human studies were found to include in this review. In contrast, there were 62 in vivo and in vitro studies that show the need for more clinical trials to prove the plant's potential to cure burn wound. Among single herbal preparations, Allium sativum, Aloe vera, Centella asiatica and Hippophae rhamnoides showed the best burn wound healing activity. Flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins and phenolic compounds were active constituents present in different herbs facilitating wound closure. Glycosides including madecassoside and asiaticoside and proteolytic enzymes were among the main active components. Phytochemicals represented positive activity at different stages of burn wound he…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive in-vitro and in-vivo studies indicate C. asiatica is one of the best medicinal plants for burn wound-healing, with asiaticoside and madecassoside especially effective.
“Extensive in‐vitro and in‐vivo studies indicate that C. asiatica is one of the best medicinal plants for burn wound‐healing activity, with asiaticoside and madecassoside proving especially effective.”
From Therapeutic Properties and Pharmacological Activities of Asiaticoside and Madecassoside: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Cites
Madecassoside Isolated from<i>Centella asiatica</i>Herbs Facilitates Burn Wound Healing in Mice
Liu, M., Dai, Y., Li, Y., Luo, Y., Huang, F., Gong, Z., & Meng, Q. (2008) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1074533 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Facilitating action of asiaticoside at low doses on burn wound repair and its mechanism
Kimura, Y., Sumiyoshi, M., Samukawa, K.-I., Satake, N., & Sakanaka, M. (2008) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.02.036 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Burn wound healing property of Cocos nucifera: An appraisal
Durgaprasad, S., & Srivastava, P. (2008) · Indian Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.4103/0253-7613.43159 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Therapeutic Properties and Pharmacological Activities of Asiaticoside and Madecassoside: A Review
Bandopadhyay, S., Mandal, S., Ghorai, M., Jha, N. K., Kumar, M., Radha, Ghosh, A., Proćków, J., Pérez de la Lastra, J. M., & Dey, A. (2023) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.17635 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Phytochemicals and antimicrobial activity of coconut water (Cocos nucifera) on microbial pathogens
Anyiam, I. V., & Opara, C. N. (2023) · GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.30574/gscbps.2023.25.2.0476 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bahramsoltani, R., Farzaei, M. H., & Rahimi, R.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Rahimi, Roja
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatological Research
- Published
- 2014-06-04
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 601-617
- ISSN
- 0003-9187 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-3696
- 1432-069X
- OpenAlex
- W2049725443
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives of Dermatological Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
- Keywords
- burn wound healing, medicinal plants, herbal products, phytochemicals, garlic, Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, Hippophae rhamnoides, flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, phenolic compounds, madecassoside, asiaticoside, proteolytic enzymes, anti-inflammatory activity, antioxidant activity, angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, natural drugs
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Burns, Humans, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Rabbits, Skin, Wound Healing, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review