The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Using probiotics to treat acne vulgaris: systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Williams HC, Dellavalle RP, Garner S (2012) Acne vulgaris. Lancet 379(9813):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60321-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Gilchrist TC (1900) A bacteriological and microscopical study of over three hundred vesicular and pustular lesions of the skin, with a research upon the etiology of Acne vulgaris. Johns Hopkins Hosp Rept 9:409–430
- Yu Y, Champer J, Agak GW, Kao S, Modlin RL, Kim J (2016) Different propionibacterium acnes phylotypes induce distinct immune responses and express unique surface and secreted proteomes. J Invest Dermatol 136(11):2221–2228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.06.615 · DOI
- Dreno B, Martin R, Moyal D, Henley JB, Khammari A, Seité S (2017) Skin microbiome and acne vulgaris : Staphylococcus, a new actor in acne. Exp Dermatol 26(9):798–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13296 · DOI
- Salem I, Ramser A, Isham N, Ghannoum MA (2018) The gut microbiome as a major regulator of the gut-skin axis. Front Microbiol 9:1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01459 · DOI · Paper page
- Fabbrocini G, Bertona M, Picazo Ó, Pareja-Galeano H, Monfrecola G, Emanuele E (2016) Supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 normalises skin expression of genes implicated in insulin signalling and improves adult acne. Benef Microbes 7(5):625–630. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2016.0089 · DOI
- Rinaldi F, Marotta L, Mascolo A et al (2022) Facial acne: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the clinical efficacy of a symbiotic dietary supplement. Dermatol Ther 12(2):577–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00664-z · DOI
- Tolino E, Skroza N, Mambrin A et al (2018) Novel combination for the treatment of acne differentiated based on gender: a new step towards personalized treatment. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05710-3 · DOI
- Kim MJ, Kim KP, Choi E et al (2021) Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP55 on clinical improvement, skin condition and urine bacterial extracellular vesicles in patients with acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients 13(4):1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041368 · DOI · Paper page
- Muizzuddin N, Maher W, Sullivan M, Schnittger S, Mammone T (2012) Physiological effect of a probiotic on skin. J Cosmet Sci 63(6):385–395
- Ho H, Chen C, Yi T et al (2022) Novel application of a co-fermented postbiotics of TYCA06 / AP -32/ CP -9/collagen in the improvement of acne vulgaris—a randomized clinical study of efficacy evaluation. J Cosmet Dermatol 21(11):6249–6260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15228 · DOI
- Han HS, Shin SH, Choi BY et al (2022) A split face study on the effect of an anti-acne product containing fermentation products of Enterococcus faecalis CBT SL-5 on skin microbiome modification and acne improvement. J Microbiol 60(5):488–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-022-1520-6 · DOI
- Kang BS, Seo JG, Lee GS et al (2009) Antimicrobial activity of enterocins from Enterococcus faecalis SL-5 against Propionibacterium acnes, the causative agent in acne vulgaris, and its therapeutic effect. J Microbiol 47(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-008-0179-y · DOI
- Lebeer S, Oerlemans EFM, Claes I et al (2022) Selective targeting of skin pathobionts and inflammation with topically applied lactobacilli. Cell Rep Med 3(2):100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100521 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Boby, A., Lee, G., Natarelli, N., & Correa, L.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boby, Aleena
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatological Research
- Published
- 2024-03-12
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 101-101
- ISSN
- 0003-9187 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-069X
- OpenAlex
- W4392682808
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Archives of Dermatological Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Keywords
- probiotics, acne, acne treatment, lactic acid bacteria, skin microbiome
- MeSH terms
- Acne Vulgaris, Humans, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
