Cited by 29Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Health-related quality of life outcome of children with prominent ears after otoplasty.

Songu, Murat, Kutlu, Ayse·2014·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

To investigate health-related quality of life changes that occurred in children with prominent ears applied pre- and postoperatively. A prospective study was performed in 67 consecutive children who underwent otoplasty procedures between April 2008 and July 2010 and followed up for more than 2 years. Evaluations and interviews performed in the pre-and postoperative periods included the patients' history, clinical and routine laboratory examinations. Glasgow children's benefit inventory was the basis of the used inquiry for detecting the changes in health-related quality of life after otoplasty. For the children's cohort, the mean total Glasgow children's benefit inventory score was 23.9 (p < 0.001), indicating a benefit from the operation. All Glasgow children's benefit inventory subscores (emotion, physical health, learning, and vitality) were raised (mean 30.84, 14.98, 18.89, and 23.96, respectively). The health-related quality of life was raised in 63 of 67 children (94.03%). Negative Glasgow children's benefit inventory scores or subscores were not found in a single case. Otoplasty can significantly increase patients' health-related quality of life and leads to a high rate of patient satisfaction in children with prominent ears.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-014-2989-3

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.

    “Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.75–79”
  • Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.

    “Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.75–79”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Songu, M., & Kutlu, A.
Affiliations
Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastalıkları Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Songu, Murat
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2014-03-15
Volume
271
Issue
6
Pages
1829-1832
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2040302470
Cited by
29
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, prominent ears, health-related quality of life, children, patient satisfaction, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review