Cited by 45Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Analysis of health-related quality-of-life outcomes and their predictive factors in pediatric patients who undergo otoplasty.

Hao, Weibo, Chorney, Jill M., Bezuhly, Michael, Wilson, Kenneth, Hong, Paul·2013·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of otoplasty on health-related quality of life in children with prominent ears. Predictors of health-related quality-of-life outcomes in otoplasty have not been well studied. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 79 patients aged 18 years and younger who underwent otoplasty, and their parents, were asked to complete a survey, which included the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, to assess the parent-reported health-related quality-of-life changes and the current health-related quality of life, respectively. Other collected data included demographics, medical history, preoperative psychosocial experiences, motivations and expectations for surgery, postoperative complications, and general satisfaction. RESULTS: Fifty patients (63 percent) replied. Of those, 88 percent reported being more satisfied with the appearance of their ears after otoplasty and 93 percent would choose to have this procedure again if given a second chance. The mean Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory total score was 24.4 and the mean Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory total score was 94.3 for the Child Self-Report and 93.3 for the Parent Proxy-Report, indicating a positive health-related quality-of-life outcome. Linear regression analysis showed that history of teasing and expectations of a "life-changing" event were significant predictors of the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory total score (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, parents reported a significant improvement in their children's health-related quality of life following otoplasty. The children themselves also reported having a generally high health-related quality of life after surgery. Possible positive predictive factors to consider include preoperative psychosocial status and expectations. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3c133

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.

    “Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.75–79”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, W., Chorney, J. M., Bezuhly, M., Wilson, K., & Hong, P.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2013-11
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
811e-817e
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315659186
Cited by
45
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, prominent ears, health-related quality of life, pediatric patients, PedsQL, parental satisfaction, peer teasing, surgical expectations, predictors of quality of life, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review