Cited by 45Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients

Open access
Kolodzynski, Michail N., Kon, Moshe, Egger, Silvan, Breugem, Corstiaan C.·2017·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

Acquired auricular deformities may diminish facial esthetics and cause psychological distress. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the type of injuries and applied reconstructive techniques in a large academic hospital in The Netherlands. A retrospective chart review was conducted for the last 105 patients who underwent auricular reconstruction for an acquired deformity. Data concerning gender, affected side, cause of injury, anatomical region, the previous and further surgeries, type of cartilage, and skin cover used were collected and analyzed. 105 patients were included. Acquired auricular deformities were mainly caused by bite injuries (22 %), traffic accidents (17 %), burns (9.5 %), and post-otoplasty complications (9.5 %). The upper third of the auricle was most often injured (41 %), followed by the entire auricle (19 %). 70 % of cases required reconstruction with costal cartilage. The most common form of cutaneous cover was a postauricular skin flap (40 % of cases). This study gives a complete overview of causes and treatment of acquired auricular deformities. The results are comparable with the results of similar studies found in literature. Bite wounds are the leading cause of acquired auricular injuries. The upper third is most commonly affected. In the largest percentage of reconstructions, costal cartilage and a postauricular flap were used to correct the deformity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-016-4299-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reconstruction of a traumatically amputated ear continues to be a major surgical challenge because of the complex shape, unique anatomical structure of the ear, and the small size of vessels responsible for its perfusion.

    “Reconstruction of traumatically amputated ear continues to be a major surgical challenge because of the complex shape, unique anatomical structure of the ear, and the small size of vessels responsible for its perfusion.[12]”

    From Auricular avulsion injuries (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion describes post-traumatic ear reconstruction as highly challenging because of the auricle’s intricate cartilaginous framework and thin soft-tissue covering. The paper does not identify the small size of vessels supplying the ear as a reason for that difficulty; its study focuses on reconstruction with autologous tissue rather than replantation of an amputated ear. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The findings on complication rate are in line with the current literature.

    “These findings are in line with the current literature on the topic [7,8,9].”

    From A Retrospective Study on Single-Stage Reconstruction of the Ear following Skin Cancer Excision in Elderly Patients (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion compares the proportion of reconstructions needed after otoplasty complications (9.5%) with figures from two earlier studies (11% and 13%). Those figures concern complications as a cause of deformity among reconstruction patients, not a general complication rate after ear reconstruction, so the broader claim is not established. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolodzynski, M. N., Kon, M., Egger, S., & Breugem, C. C.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Kolodzynski, Michail N.
  • Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2016-10-06
Volume
274
Issue
2
Pages
723-728
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2528843749
Cited by
45
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
ear trauma, ear reconstruction, costal cartilage, bite wounds, traffic accidents, burns, cartilage grafts, skin cover
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Amputation, Traumatic, Bites and Stings, Burns, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Flaps, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures, Costal Cartilage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review