Cited by 18Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neuropsychological Deficits but Not Coping Strategies Are Related to Physical Disability in Multiple Sclerosis

Haase, Claus G., Lienemann, Marc, Faustmann, Pedro M.·2007·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Detailed neuropsychological assessment was performed in 86 women (48 patients with stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and 38 matched healthy controls (HC)). Patients were categorized into patients without (EDSS < or =1, n = 26) and with physical disability (EDSS > or =2, n = 22). Patients with EDSS > or =2 scored significantly (P < 0.05) higher in Beck's depression inventory (BDI) and depression scores (DS) compared to HC and patients with EDSS < or =1. No significant differences were found with respect to the use of specific coping strategies between the patient groups, who preferred active (EDSS < or =1) or distracting (EDSS > or =2) strategies. Cognitive deficits were significantly increased in MS with EDSS > or =2 with regard to visuo-construction and visual memory, in particular with respect to geometric figures, compared to MS with EDSS < or =1. Significant positive correlations of depression variables (BDI, DS and BL) and depressive as well as denying coping strategies were found. Our results showed increased depression scores and increased cognitive deficits in advanced physically disabled patients, without selection of specific coping strategies. This supports an individual MS-specific neuropsychological therapeutic approach in order to improve disease related deficits together with social functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-007-0759-6

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haase, C. G., Lienemann, M., & Faustmann, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Haase, Claus G.
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2007-11-07
Volume
258
Issue
1
Pages
35-39
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2061492614
Cited by
18
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, physical disability, neuropsychological deficits, cognitive impairment, depression, coping strategies, visual memory, women, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, disability progression
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuropsychological Tests, Wechsler Scales, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review