Cited by 33Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Coping Strategies and Mood Profiles in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Milanlioglu, Aysel, Özdemir, Pinar Güzel, Cilingir, Vedat, Gülec, Tezay Çakin, Aydin, Mehmet Nuri, Tombul, Temel·2014·Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the coping strategies, mood characteristics and the association between these aspects in patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and healthy subjects. METHOD: Fifty consecutive patients who were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis according to McDonald criteria and thirty-one healthy subjects were included in the study. In addition to the sociodemographic form, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences Scale (COPE), and Profile of Mood States (POMS) tests were applied to the participants. RESULTS: Non-functional coping strategies were significantly higher in the secondary-progressive type (p≤0.05). Depression-dejection, fatigue-inertia and total POMS scores were significantly higher in the secondary-progressive type (p≤0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation programs that encourage exercise among patients with multiple sclerosis to increase vigor-activity levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0004-282x20140089

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies.

    “several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; [26]), is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies [22,23,27,28].”

    From Coping strategies and their impact on quality of life and physical disability of people with multiple sclerosis (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

    The MS results section reports a positive correlation between EDSS scores and behavioral disengagement, supporting the avoidance-coping part of the claim. It does not establish a general increase in emotion-based coping with greater disability: humor was positively correlated with EDSS only in men, while positive reinterpretation and growth was negatively correlated overall. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ağargün MY, Beşiroğlu L, Kıran ÜK, Özer OA, Kara H. COPE (Başa Çıkma Tutumlarını Değerlendirme Ölçeği): Psikometrik özelliklere ilişkin bir ön çalışma. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2005;6:221-226.
  2. Koçer E, Koçer A, Yaman M, Eryılmaz M, Özdem S, Börü ÜT. Multipl skleroz olgularında yaşam kalitesi: Fiziksel özürlülük ve depresyonun etkisi? J Mood Disord 2011;1:63-67.
  3. Emre U, Ergün U, Yıldız H, Coşkun Ö, I • nan LE. Multipl sklerozda depresyon. Düşünen Adam 2003;16:53-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milanlioglu, A., Özdemir, P. G., Cilingir, V., Gülec, T. Ç., Aydin, M. N., & Tombul, T.
Affiliations
  • Yuzuncu Y?l University, Turkey
  • Erzurum Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
  • Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Venue
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Published
2014-07
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
490-495
ISSN
0004-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964264650
Cited by
33
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, mood, depression, fatigue, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, disability severity, exercise rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychological Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review