Cited by 202Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines

Open access
Leucht, Stefan, Chaimani, Anna, Cipriani, Andrea S., Davis, John M., Furukawa, Toshi A., Salanti, Georgia·2016·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-016-0715-4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leucht, S., Chaimani, A., Cipriani, A. S., Davis, J. M., Furukawa, T. A., & Salanti, G.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Leucht, Stefan
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2016-07-19
Volume
266
Issue
6
Pages
477-480
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2495235786
Cited by
202
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
network meta-analysis, treatment guidelines, level of evidence, evidence-based medicine, guideline development
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Mental Disorders, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents, Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review