Cited by 1,930Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryTreatment of Major Depression

Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

Leucht, Stefan, Corves, Caroline, Arbter, Dieter, Engel, Rolf R, Li, Chunbo, Davis, John M·2009·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Because of the debate about whether second-generation antipsychotic drugs are better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs, we did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to compare the effects of these two types of drugs in patients with schizophrenia. Methods We compared nine second-generation antipsychotic drugs with first-generation drugs for overall efficacy (main outcome), positive, negative and depressive symptoms, relapse, quality of life, extrapyramidal side-effects, weight gain, and sedation. Findings We included 150 double-blind, mostly short-term, studies, with 21 533 participants. We excluded open studies because they systematically favoured second-generation drugs. Four of these drugs were better than first-generation antipsychotic drugs for overall efficacy, with small to medium effect sizes (amisulpride -0.31 [95% CI -0.44 to -0.19, p Interpretation Second-generation antipsychotic drugs differ in many properties and are not a homogeneous class. This meta-analysis provides data for individualised treatment based on efficacy, side-effects, and cost.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61764-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional treatment or support is often needed for individuals using antipsychotic medication who still have ongoing symptoms of psychosis.

    “Since around two-thirds of the individuals using antipsychotic medication still have ongoing symptoms of psychosis (Leucht et al., 2009) additional treatment or support is often needed.”
  • Current treatments with antipsychotics are relatively effective in the management of psychotic symptoms, but they have modest impact upon negative symptoms.

    “Current treatments with antipsychotics are relatively effective in the management of psychotic symptoms (delusions, hallucinations, bizarre thoughts, paranoia), but they have modest impact upon negative symptoms (decreased expression, avolition) 40 ,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leucht, S., Corves, C., Arbter, D., Engel, R. R., Li, C., & Davis, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Leucht, Stefan
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
373
Issue
9657
Pages
31-41
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2152770536
Cited by
1,930
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 176
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1-P01MH68580-01-CFDA-#93.242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, schizophrenia, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, haloperidol, negative symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, sedation, relapse, quality of life
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Humans, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Weight Gain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review