Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease?

Open access
Drapier, D., Drapier, S., Sauleau, P., Haegelen, C., Raoul, S., Biseul, I., Peron, J., Lallement, F., Rivier, I., Reymann, J.M., Edan, G., Verin, M., Millet, B.·2006·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

BackgroundSubthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS) has been shown to significantly improve motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Only few studies, however, have focused on the non-motor effects of DBS.MethodsA consecutive series of 15 patients was assessed three months before (M-3), then three months (M3) and six months (M6) after surgery. Mean (± SD) age at surgery was 59.7 (7.6). Mean disease duration at surgery was 12.2 (2.8) years. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory was used to assess psychiatric disorders three months before surgery. Depression was evaluated using Montgomery and Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS). Anxiety was evaluated using the AMDP system (Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry). Apathy was particularly evaluated using the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and the Starkstein Scale. All these scales were performed at every evaluation.ResultsApathy worsened at M3 and M6 after STN-DBS in comparison with the preoperative evaluation: the AES mean score was significantly impaired between the preoperative (38.4±7.1) and both the postoperative M3 (44.6±9.5, p = 0.003) and M6 scores (46.0±10.9, p = 0.013). Significant worsening of apathy was confirmed using the Starkstein scale. There was no evidence of depression: the mean MADRS score did not differ before surgery (9.1±7.4) and at both M3 (8.6±8.2) and M6 (9.9±7.7) after STN-DBS. The anxiety level did not change between preoperative (9.4±9.2) and both M3 (5.5±4.5) and M6 (6.6±4.6) postoperative states.ConclusionAlthough STN-DBS constitutes a therapeutic advance for severely disabled patients with Parkinson’s disease, we should keep in mind that this surgical procedure may contribute to the inducing of apathy. Our observation raises the issue of the direct influence of STN- DBS on the limbic system by diffusion of stimulus to the medial limbic compartment of STN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-006-0177-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Drapier, D., Drapier, S., Sauleau, P., Haegelen, C., Raoul, S., Biseul, I., Peron, J., Lallement, F., Rivier, I., Reymann, J. M., Edan, G., Verin, M., & Millet, B.
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2006-04-10
Volume
253
Issue
8
Pages
1083-1091
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2140791182
Cited by
221
References
5
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00415-006-0177-0
The paper
Drapier, D., Drapier, S., Sauleau, P., Haegelen, C., Raoul, S., Biseul, I., Peron, J., Lallement, F., Rivier, I., Reymann, J. M., Edan, G., Verin, M., & Millet, B. (2006). Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease? Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0177-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.