Cited by 79Infectious Diseases and TuberculosisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

Multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

Kusum, Sharma, Aman, Sharma, Pallab, Ray, Kumar, Sharma Shiv, Manish, Modi, Sudesh, Prabhakar, Subhash, Varma, Meera, Sharma·2011·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Rapid and specific diagnosis of tubercular meningitis is of paramount importance to decrease morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to evaluate multiplex PCR using protein b, MPB 64, and IS6110 primers directed against M. tuberculosis complex for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Multiplex PCR was performed on 18 TBM confirmed cases (culture was positive), 92 clinically suspected TBM cases and 100 non-TBM (control group) patients. Multiplex PCR had a sensitivity of 94.4% for confirmed cases and specificity of 100% for confirmed TBM cases. In 92 clinically diagnosed but unconfirmed TBM cases, multiplex PCR was positive in 84.78% cases. The overall sensitivity of microscopy, culture and multiplex cases were 1.81, 16.73, and 86.63% and specificity was 100, 100, and 100% respectively. Multiplex PCR using protein b, MPB 64, and IS6110 primers has a high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of tubercular meningitis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-011-6010-4

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of IS6110 PCR for tuberculous meningitis reported sensitivity between 72% and 100% (median 91%) and specificity between 82% and 100% (median 99%).

    “Several studies, with sample sizes ranging from 13 to 102 definite tuberculous meningitis patients and 17 to 127 controls, studied the performance of IS6110 PCR and reported a sensitivity between 72% and 100% (median 91%) with a specificity between 82% and 100% (median 99%) (73–78).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kusum, S., Aman, S., Pallab, R., Kumar, S. S., Manish, M., Sudesh, P., Subhash, V., & Meera, S.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2011-03-31
Volume
258
Issue
10
Pages
1781-1787
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2006679543
Cited by
79
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
tuberculous meningitis, multiplex PCR, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, protein B, IS6110, rapid diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, Meningeal, Young Adult, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review