Cited by 154Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinationsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vaccines and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Abstract

Vaccinations are often the most effective tool against some disease known to mankind. This study offers a literature review on the role of vaccines regarding the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and MS relapse. The method used in this study is a systematic literature review on the database PubMed. The study found no change in risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) after vaccination against hepatitis B virus, human papillomavirus, seasonal influenza, measles-mumps-rubella, variola, tetanus, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), polio, or diphtheria. No change in risk of relapse was found for influenza. Further research is needed for the potential therapeutic use of the BCG vaccine in patients in risk of developing MS and for the preventive potential of the tetanus and diphtheria vaccine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-016-8263-4

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two recent systematic reviews concluded there was no relationship between receipt of a vaccine and development of multiple sclerosis.

    “Two recent systematic reviews looking at the association between different individual vaccines and central demyelinating disorders (hepatitis B, human papilloma virus (HPV), influenza, MMR, varicella, tetanus, Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG), polio or diphtheria) concluded that there was no relationship between receipt of a vaccine and development of MS (Mailand and Frederiksen, 2017; Mouchet et al”

    From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as Mailand and Frederiksen, 2017

  • Existing epidemiologic studies have found no associations between the number of different vaccines and an increased risk of autoimmune disorders.

    “Existing epidemiologic studies have found no associations between the number of different vaccines and an increased risk of autoimmune disorders.”

    From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as Mailand and Frederiksen, 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mailand, M. T., & Frederiksen, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2016-09-07
Volume
264
Issue
6
Pages
1035-1050
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2514636267
Cited by
154
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, vaccines, hepatitis B vaccine, HPV vaccine, seasonal influenza vaccine, MMR vaccine, smallpox vaccine, tetanus vaccine, BCG vaccine, diphtheria vaccine, polio vaccine, multiple sclerosis risk, relapse
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review