Cited by 1Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesGastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel Disease

Gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sredanović, Mašan, Hentzen, Claire, Adamec, Ivan, Chesnel, Camille, Krbot Skorić Krbot Skorić, Magdalena, Habek, Mario·2026·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and disorders are frequently reported in multiple sclerosis (MS), but the evidence remains fragmented and highly diverse. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the extent and range of GI symptoms and disorders in people with MS (pwMS). Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 1, 2025. Eligible studies included observational and interventional designs that reported GI symptoms or diseases in MS. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported by three or more studies. Prevalence estimates were pooled across all eligible studies, and odds ratios (ORs) were additionally calculated for outcomes reported in case-control studies. Results A total of 114 studies involving 1,272,170 pwMS were included. Autonomic GI dysfunction was the predominant phenotype, affecting approximately one-third of pwMS (31.4% [95% CI 26.4-36.5%]), with a high prevalence of dysphagia (43.4% [95% CI 35.9-51.0%]) and bowel dysfunction (37.9% [95% CI 25.0-51.8%]). When analyzed by anatomical domains, lower GI symptoms and disorders were more frequent than upper GI manifestations (28.9% vs 11.5%). In case-control analyses, pwMS had significantly higher odds of autonomic GI dysfunction compared with controls (OR 3.26 [95% CI 1.81-5.86]). Substantial between-study heterogeneity was present across all analyses. Conclusions Autonomic GI involvement is a common and clinically important aspect of MS. Marked heterogeneity reflects differences in assessment methods and populations, supporting the view of pooled estimates as general indicators and emphasizing the need for standardized outcome definitions and structured clinical screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-026-14041-3

Cites

122 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gavalas E, Kountouras J, Boziki M, Zavos C, Polyzos SA, Vlachaki E, Venizelos I, Tsiptsios D, Deretzi G. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and multiple sclerosis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):353–356.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Sredanović, M., Hentzen, C., Adamec, I., Chesnel, C., Krbot Skorić Krbot Skorić, M., & Habek, M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Habek, Mario
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2026-08-06
Volume
273
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W7196954289
Cited by
1
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, gastrointestinal symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, dysphagia, bowel dysfunction, prevalence, lower gastrointestinal tract, upper gastrointestinal tract, clinical screening
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review