The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of elderly fallers by muscle strength measures
Open accessAbstract
For efficient prevention of falls among older adults, individuals at a high risk of falling need to be identified. In this study, we searched for muscle strength measures that best identified those individuals who would fall after a gait perturbation and those who recovered their balance. Seventeen healthy older adults performed a range of muscle strength tests. We measured maximum and rate of development of ankle plantar flexion moment, knee extension moment and whole leg push-off force, as well as maximum jump height and hand grip strength. Subsequently, their capacity to regain balance after tripping over an obstacle was determined experimentally. Seven of the participants were classified as fallers based on the tripping outcome. Maximum isometric push-off force in a leg press apparatus was the best measure to identify the fallers, as cross-validation of a discriminant model with this variable resulted in the best classification (86% sensitivity and 90% specificity). Jump height and hand grip strength were strongly correlated to leg press force (r = 0.82 and 0.59, respectively) and can also be used to identify fallers, although with slightly lower specificity. These results indicate that whole leg extension strength is associated with the ability to prevent a fall after a gait perturbation and might be used to identify the elderly at risk of falling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Ruiter, C. J., Kooistra, R. D., Paalman, M. I., & de Haan, A. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00230.2004 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Fyfe, J. J., Bishop, D. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0162-1 · Cited by 347
Human capacity for explosive force production: Neural and contractile determinants
Folland, J. P., Buckthorpe, M. W., & Hannah, R. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12131 · Cited by 327
Hvid, L., Aagaard, P., Justesen, L., Bayer, M. L., Andersen, J. L., Ørtenblad, N., Kjaer, M., & Suetta, C. (2010) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00637.2010 · Cited by 195
Tillin, N. A., & Folland, J. P. (2014) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2781-x · Cited by 140
Power Training: Can it Improve Functional Performance in Older Adults? A Systematic Review
Rice, J., & Keogh, J. (2009) · International Journal of Exercise Science · doi:10.70252/culd5534 · Cited by 51
Mulder, E. R., Horstman, A. M., Stegeman, D. F., de Haan, A., Belavý, D. L., Miokovic, T., Armbrecht, G., Felsenberg, D., & Gerrits, K. H. (2009) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00230.2009 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Pijnappels, M., van der Burg, (. J. C. E., Reeves, N. D., & van Dieën, J. H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2007-12-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 585-592
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-6319
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W2147305765
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.