Cited by 51Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in AgingSports Performance and Training

Power Training: Can it Improve Functional Performance in Older Adults? A Systematic Review

Open access
Rice, John, Keogh, Justin·2009·International Journal of Exercise Science

Abstract

Older adults’ reduced performance in functional activities of daily living (ADL) such as gait, sit to stand or stair climbing may reflect age-related declines in muscular power more so than strength. Therefore, this review was conducted to determine if power training is effective in improving the functional ability of older adults, and if so, if it was more effective than strength training. The review was performed using Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, Sports Discus, ProQuest 5000 International and Google Scholar with the keywords “power training”, “older adult” and “elder” and all derivatives. Of the 12 eligible studies identified, nine also included a strength training group. Virtually all studies reported significant increases in strength and power for the strength and power training groups. Significant improvements in functional performance were observed for the power training groups in 10 of the 12 studies and in the strength training group in four of the nine studies that also examined the effect of strength training. These results demonstrate that strength and power training can both significantly improve functional performance in older adults, and suggest that power training may be more effective than strength training in this regard. Future research in this area should involve larger sample sizes of older men and women with varying levels of pre-training strength, power and functional ability and: 1) compare the relative efficacy of strength and power training; 2) determine if the optimal training prescription differs somewhat for each functional task; and 3) examine changes in quality of life and falls rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70252/culd5534

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rice, J., & Keogh, J.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Venue
International Journal of Exercise Science
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
131
ISSN
1939-795X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524122914
Cited by
51
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • International journal of exercise science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
power training, resistance training, older adults, functional performance, activities of daily living, muscle power, age-related decline, gait, sit-to-stand, stair climbing, fall prevention, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review