Cited by 81Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Consecutive days of cold water immersion: effects on cycling performance and heart rate variability.

Stanley, Jamie, Peake, Jonathan M., Buchheit, Martin·2013·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We investigated performance and heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) over consecutive days of cycling with post-exercise cold water immersion (CWI) or passive recovery (PAS). In a crossover design, 11 cyclists completed two separate 3-day training blocks (120 min cycling per day, 66 maximal sprints, 9 min time trialling [TT]), followed by 2 days of recovery-based training. The cyclists recovered from each training session by standing in cold water (10 °C) or at room temperature (27 °C) for 5 min. Mean power for sprints, total TT work and HR were assessed during each session. Resting vagal-HRV (natural logarithm of square-root of mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals; ln rMSSD) was assessed after exercise, after the recovery intervention, during sleep and upon waking. CWI allowed better maintenance of mean sprint power (between-trial difference [90 % confidence limits] +12.4 % [5.9; 18.9]), cadence (+2.0 % [0.6; 3.5]), and mean HR during exercise (+1.6 % [0.0; 3.2]) compared with PAS. ln rMSSD immediately following CWI was higher (+144 % [92; 211]) compared with PAS. There was no difference between the trials in TT performance (-0.2 % [-3.5; 3.0]) or waking ln rMSSD (-1.2 % [-5.9; 3.4]). CWI helps to maintain sprint performance during consecutive days of training, whereas its effects on vagal-HRV vary over time and depend on prior exercise intensity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-012-2445-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanley, J., Peake, J. M., & Buchheit, M.
Affiliations
  • Queensland Academy of Sport (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Aspire Academy (QA)
Corresponding author
Stanley, Jamie
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2012-07-03
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
371-384
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2007606901
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Centre of Excellence and Applied Sport Science Research, Queensland Academy of Sport
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
cold water immersion, post-exercise recovery, cycling performance, heart rate variability, parasympathetic activity, sprint power, passive recovery, exercise intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrotherapy, Hypothermia, Induced, Immersion, Male, Physical Endurance, Muscle Fatigue, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review