Cited by 26Sports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Big claims for big weights but with little evidence

Open access
Burd, Nicholas A., Moore, Daniel R., Mitchell, Cameron J., Phillips, Stuart M.·2013·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-012-2527-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers have called low-load training a milder form of low-load blood flow restrictive exercise, suggesting the two forms of exercise may induce adaptations through similar mechanistic actions.

    “Although low-load BFR training and traditional low-load training have inherent differences, some researchers have called low-load training a “milder form of low-load blood flow restrictive exercise” [58], suggesting the two forms of exercise may induce adaptations through similar mechanistic actions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burd, N. A., Moore, D. R., Mitchell, C. J., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Stuart M.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2012-10-20
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
267-268
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W1985590141
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
body weight, body mass, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Female, Humans, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review