Cited by 24Body Composition Measurement TechniquesThermoregulation and physiological responsesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Evaluation of fat-free mass hydration in athletes and non-athletes

Sagayama, Hiroyuki, Yamada, Yosuke, Ichikawa, Mamiko, Kondo, Emi, Yasukata, Jun, Tanabe, Yoko, Higaki, Yasuki, Takahashi, Hideyuki·2020·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the hydration of fat-free mass (FFM) in athletes and non-athletes. Methods We analyzed the data of 128 healthy young adults (athletes: 61 men, 36 women; non-athletes: 19 men, 12 women) using the two-component (2C), 3C and 4C models. Under-water weighing or air-displacement plethysmography and deuterium dilution methods were used for estimating body density and total body water, respectively. The bone mineral content (BMC) was determined using whole-body scans by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results There was no significant difference in FFM hydration between the athletes (men, 72.3 ± 1.3%; women, 71.8 ± 1.3%) and non-athletes (men, 72.1 ± 1.2%; women, 72.2% ± 1.0%) in the 3C model. The total mean FFM hydration (72.1% ± 1.3%) was similar to the corresponding value in the literature (~ 73%). The estimation error of the percentage fat by the 2C vs the 4C model was significantly and highly correlated with hydration (r = 0.96), BMC (r = - 0.70), and total body protein (r = - 0.86) in the 4C model FFM. Conclusion Although FFM hydration was similar in athletes and non-athletes, it would be underestimated or overestimated when the 2C model is used for evaluation, and the biological FFM hydration value deviates from the 73% value inter-individually. Despite that this inter-individual variation in FFM hydration is low in terms of between-individual standard deviation (1.3%), the BMC and total body protein differ greatly in athletes, and when it affects FFM hydr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-020-04356-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sagayama, H., Yamada, Y., Ichikawa, M., Kondo, E., Yasukata, J., Tanabe, Y., Higaki, Y., & Takahashi, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • National Institute of Health and Nutrition (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
  • Japan Institute of Sports Sciences (JP)
  • Fukuoka University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sagayama, Hiroyuki
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
1179-1188
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W3014692440
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16J11877, 18K17882)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
athletes, non-athletes, body composition, total body water, bone mineral content, total body protein, body fat percentage, air displacement plethysmography, deuterium dilution, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Female, Humans, Male, Bone Density, Young Adult, Athletes, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review