Evaluation of fat-free mass hydration in athletes and non-athletes
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the hydration of fat-free mass (FFM) in athletes and non-athletes. Methods We analyzed the data of 128 healthy young adults (athletes: 61 men, 36 women; non-athletes: 19 men, 12 women) using the two-component (2C), 3C and 4C models. Under-water weighing or air-displacement plethysmography and deuterium dilution methods were used for estimating body density and total body water, respectively. The bone mineral content (BMC) was determined using whole-body scans by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results There was no significant difference in FFM hydration between the athletes (men, 72.3 ± 1.3%; women, 71.8 ± 1.3%) and non-athletes (men, 72.1 ± 1.2%; women, 72.2% ± 1.0%) in the 3C model. The total mean FFM hydration (72.1% ± 1.3%) was similar to the corresponding value in the literature (~ 73%). The estimation error of the percentage fat by the 2C vs the 4C model was significantly and highly correlated with hydration (r = 0.96), BMC (r = - 0.70), and total body protein (r = - 0.86) in the 4C model FFM. Conclusion Although FFM hydration was similar in athletes and non-athletes, it would be underestimated or overestimated when the 2C model is used for evaluation, and the biological FFM hydration value deviates from the 73% value inter-individually. Despite that this inter-individual variation in FFM hydration is low in terms of between-individual standard deviation (1.3%), the BMC and total body protein differ greatly in athletes, and when it affects FFM hydr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of the hydration factor to estimate FFM from EQ4 could increase bias in different age ranges, as the hydration factor may vary slightly on an individual basis.
“Moreover, the use of the hydration factor to estimate FFM from EQ4 could increase bias in different age ranges, as the hydration factor may vary slightly on the individual basis (Bossingham et al., 2005;Sagayama et al., 2020).”
From External validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis equations for body composition against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Mexican recreational runners (2025) · cites this paper as Sagayama et al., 2020
Cites
Ackland, T. R., Lohman, T. G., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Maughan, R. J., Meyer, N. L., Stewart, A. D., & Müller, W. (2012) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Bosy-Westphal, A., Jensen, B., Braun, W., Pourhassan, M., Gallagher, D., & Müller, M. J. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2017.27 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Ng, B. K., Liu, Y. E., Wang, W., Kelly, T. L., Wilson, K. E., Schoeller, D. A., Heymsfield, S. B., & Shepherd, J. A. (2018) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy158 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Magnitude and variation of fat-free mass density: a cellular-level body composition modeling study
Wang, Z., Heshka, S., Wang, J., Wielopolski, L., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00151.2002 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Gutiérrez-Marín, D., Luque, V., Ferré, N., Fewtrell, M. S., Williams, J. E., & Wells, J. C. K. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-019-0447-4 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vázquez-Bautista, M. A., Robles-Sardin, A. E., Reséndiz-Sandoval, M., Navarro-Ibarra, M. J., Hernández López, J., & Caire-Juvera, G. (2025) · BIOtecnia · doi:10.18633/biotecnia.v27.2512
“Moreover, the use of the hydration factor to estimate FFM from EQ4 could increase bias in different age ranges, as the hydration factor may vary slightly on the individual basis (Bossingham et al ., 2005; Sagayama et al ., 2020).”
- Authors
- Sagayama, H., Yamada, Y., Ichikawa, M., Kondo, E., Yasukata, J., Tanabe, Y., Higaki, Y., & Takahashi, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- National Institute of Health and Nutrition (JP)
- Teikyo University (JP)
- Japan Institute of Sports Sciences (JP)
- Fukuoka University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Sagayama, Hiroyuki
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1179-1188
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-6319
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W3014692440
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16J11877, 18K17882)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- athletes, non-athletes, body composition, total body water, bone mineral content, total body protein, body fat percentage, air displacement plethysmography, deuterium dilution, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Female, Humans, Male, Bone Density, Young Adult, Athletes, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review