Cited by 73Body Composition Measurement TechniquesBone health and osteoporosis researchHIV-related health complications and treatments

Validation of rapid 4-component body composition assessment with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis

Open access
Ng, Bennett K, Liu, Yong E, Wang, Wei, Kelly, Thomas L, Wilson, Kevin E, Schoeller, Dale A, Heymsfield, Steven B, Shepherd, John A·2018·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The 4-component (4C) model is a criterion method for human body composition that separates the body into fat, water, mineral, and protein, but requires 4 measurements with significant cost and time requirements that preclude wide clinical use. A simplified model integrating only 2 measurements-dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-and 10 min of patient time has been proposed. Objective: We aimed to validate a rapid, simplified 4C DXA + BIA body composition model in a clinical population. Design: This was a cross-sectional observational study of 31 healthy adults. Participants underwent whole-body DXA, segmental BIA, air displacement plethysmography (ADP), and total body water (TBW) measurement by deuterium (D2O) dilution. 4C composition was calculated through the use of the Lohman model [DXA mineral mass, D2O TBW, ADP body volume (BV), scale weight] and the simplified model (DXA mineral mass and BV, BIA TBW, scale weight). Accuracy of percentage of fat (%Fat) and protein measurements was assessed via linear regression. Test-retest precision was calculated with the use of duplicate DXA and BIA measurements. Results: Of 31 participants, 23 were included in the analysis. TBWBIA showed good test-retest precision (%CV = 5.2 raw; 1.1 after outlier removal) and high accuracy to TBWD2O [TBWD2O = 0.956*TBWBIA, R2= 0.92, root mean squared error (RMSE) = 2.2 kg]. %Fat estimates from DXA, ADP, D2O, and BIA all showed high correlation with the Lohman model. However, only the 4C simplified model provides high accuracy for both %Fat (R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 2.33) and protein mass (R2= 0.76, RMSE = 1.8 kg). %Fat precision from 4C DXA + BIA was comparable with DXA (root mean square-SD = 0.8 and 0.6 percentage units, respectively). Conclusions: This work validates a simplified 4C method that measures fat, water, mineral, and protein in a 10-min clinic visit. This model has broad clinical application to monitor many conditions including over/dehydration, malnutrition, obesity, sarcopenia, and cachexia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/nqy158

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A personalized approach to obesity assessment considers factors such as muscle mass, visceral fat levels, and metabolic health markers, in addition to weight status.

    “This personalized approach to obesity assessment considers factors such as muscle mass, visceral fat levels, and metabolic health markers, in addition to weight status [64].”

    From Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Abstract Conclusions and Discussion (pages not provided) describe assessing fat, protein, and hydration for clinical uses that include obesity, supporting assessment beyond weight alone. The paper does not specify visceral fat levels or metabolic health markers as components of that assessment, and its protein or lean-mass measures are not direct muscle-mass measurements. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Assessments for harmful adiposity encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability.

    “Medical evaluations with greater predictive value need accurate measures and a definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity, as well as functional assessments; such assessments encounter health system constraints of accessibility and affordability [64].”

    From Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says conventional four-component body-composition assessment is costly and time-consuming and therefore seldom used in clinics, supporting an affordability and accessibility constraint for that method. The paper does not establish the same constraint for functional assessments or definitive diagnosis of harmful adiposity more generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, B. K., Liu, Y. E., Wang, W., Kelly, T. L., Wilson, K. E., Schoeller, D. A., Heymsfield, S. B., & Shepherd, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center (US)
  • Hologic (United States) (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shepherd, John A
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
108
Issue
4
Pages
708-715
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885594499
Cited by
73
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-12-01)
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hologic Investigator-Initiated Study (P0515173)
  • NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
Keywords
body composition assessment, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, air displacement plethysmography, deuterium dilution, total body water, fat mass, protein mass, method validation, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Male, Middle Aged, Minerals, Nutritional Status, Plethysmography, Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Linear Models, Electric Impedance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review