Cited by 150Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The dynamical stability of reverberatory neural circuits

Tegnér, Jesper, Compte, Albert, Wang, Xiao-Jing·2002·Biological Cybernetics

Abstract

The concept of reverberation proposed by Lorente de Nó and Hebb is key to understanding strongly recurrent cortical networks. In particular, synaptic reverberation is now viewed as a likely mechanism for the active maintenance of working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Theoretically, this has spurred a debate as to how such a potentially explosive mechanism can provide stable working-memory function given the synaptic and cellular mechanisms at play in the cerebral cortex. We present here new evidence for the participation of NMDA receptors in the stabilization of persistent delay activity in a biophysical network model of conductance-based neurons. We show that the stability of working-memory function, and the required NMDA/AMPA ratio at recurrent excitatory synapses, depend on physiological properties of neurons and synaptic interactions, such as the time constants of excitation and inhibition, mutual inhibition between interneurons, differential NMDA receptor participation at excitatory projections to pyramidal neurons and interneurons, or the presence of slow intrinsic ion currents in pyramidal neurons. We review other mechanisms proposed to enhance the dynamical stability of synaptically generated attractor states of a reverberatory circuit. This recent work represents a necessary and significant step towards testing attractor network models by cortical electrophysiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00422-002-0363-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both cAMP and PKC signalling reduce the depolarizing current ICAN, which would further weaken persistent firing.

    “Both cAMP99 and PKC100 signalling reduce the depolarizing current ICAN, which would further weaken persistent firing89,101,102.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tegnér, J., Compte, A., & Wang, X.-J.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Biological Cybernetics
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
87
Issue
5-6
Pages
471-481
ISSN
0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999417135
Cited by
150
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dynamic stability, working memory, NMDA receptor, attractor networks, pyramidal neurons, conductance-based neuron model, prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Mathematics, Memory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neurons, Synapses, Time Factors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Receptors, AMPA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review