Cited by 144Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A recurrent network model of somatosensory parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex

Open access
Miller, P.·2003·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

A parametric working memory network stores the information of an analog stimulus in the form of persistent neural activity that is monotonically tuned to the stimulus. The family of persistent firing patterns with a continuous range of firing rates must all be realizable under exactly the same external conditions (during the delay when the transient stimulus is withdrawn). How this can be accomplished by neural mechanisms remains an unresolved question. Here we present a recurrent cortical network model of irregularly spiking neurons that was designed to simulate a somatosensory working memory experiment with behaving monkeys. Our model reproduces the observed positively and negatively monotonic persistent activity, and heterogeneous tuning curves of memory activity. We show that fine-tuning mathematically corresponds to a precise alignment of cusps in the bifurcation diagram of the network. Moreover, we show that the fine-tuned network can integrate stimulus inputs over several seconds. Assuming that such time integration occurs in neural populations downstream from a tonically persistent neural population, our model is able to account for the slow ramping-up and ramping-down behaviors of neurons observed in prefrontal cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhg101

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two neural populations coupled by reciprocal inhibition exhibit persistent activity that is positively and negatively monotonically tuned to the first frequency f1, as observed in prefrontal neurons.

    “Moreover, two such neural populations coupled by reciprocal inhibition exhibit persistent activity that is positively and negatively, respectively, monotonically tuned to the first frequency f1, as observed in prefrontal neurons in this task (Romo et al., 1999; Brody et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2003).”

    From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2003

  • Miller et al. showed that fine-tuning of connectivity in the somatosensory discrimination model yields a line attractor capable of parametric working memory.

    “Miller et al. (Miller et al., 2003) showed that fine-tuning of connectivity in this model yields a line attractor capable of parametric working memory, similar to the one in the gaze-control system (Seung et al., 2000).”

    From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hansel D, Sompolinsky H (1998) Modeling feature selectivity in local cortical circuits. In: Methods in neuronal modeling, 2nd edn (Koch C, Segev I, eds), pp. 499-567. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, P.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, P.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
1208-1218
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2122186032
Cited by
144
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Brandeis University
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062349, MH-62349, K25MH064497)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, recurrent neural network model, persistent activity, bifurcation analysis, time integration
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Macaca, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Neural Networks, Computer, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review