Cited by 98Selenium in Biological SystemsNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on BrassicaPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

Sulfur–selenium–molybdenum interactions distinguish selenium hyperaccumulator Stanleya pinnata from non-hyperaccumulator Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae)

Harris, Jonathan, Schneberg, Kathryn A., Pilon-Smits, Elizabeth A. H.·2014·Planta

Abstract

Long-term sulfate, selenate and molybdate accumulation and translocation were investigated in two ecotypes of Stanleya pinnata and non-hyperaccumulator Brassica juncea under different levels of applied sulfate and selenate. Morphological differences were observed between the ecotypes of S. pinnata, but few differences in selenium (Se) and sulfur (S) accumulation were measured. Se-to-S ratios were nearly identical between the ecotypes under all treatments. When compared with B. juncea, several unique trends were observed in the hyperaccumulators. While both S. pinnata ecotypes showed no significant effect on Se content of young leaves when the supplied sulfate in the growth medium was increased tenfold (from 0.5 to 5 mM), the Se levels in B. juncea decreased 4- to 12-fold with increased sulfate in the growth medium. Furthermore, S. pinnata’s S levels decreased slightly with high levels of supplied Se, suggesting competitive inhibition of uptake, while B. juncea showed higher S levels with increasing Se, possibly due to up-regulation of sulfate transporters. Both ecotypes of S. pinnata showed much larger Se concentrations in young leaves, while B. juncea showed slightly higher levels of Se in older leaves relative to young. Molybdenum (Mo) levels significantly decreased in S. pinnata with increasing sulfate and selenate in the medium; B. juncea did not show the same trends. These findings support the hypothesis that S. pinnata contains a modified sulfate transporter with a higher specificity for selenate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00425-013-1996-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, J., Schneberg, K. A., & Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Planta
Published
2013-11-15
Volume
239
Issue
2
Pages
479-491
ISSN
  • 0032-0935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2048
OpenAlex
W2023483982
Cited by
98
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Planta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
Stanleya pinnata, Brassica juncea, selenium hyperaccumulation, sulfate uptake, molybdenum, sulfate transporters, ecotypes, Brassicaceae
MeSH terms
Molybdenum, Mustard Plant, Selenium, Species Specificity, Sulfur, Plant Leaves, Plant Roots, Plant Shoots, Brassicaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review