Cited by 52Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAI in cancer detectionRadiology practices and education

Diagnostic telepathology: long-term experience of a single institution

Brauchli, Kurt, Oberli, Hermann, Hurwitz, Nina, Kunze, Klaus-Dieter, Haroske, Gunter, Jundt, Gernot, Stauch, Gerhard, Banach, Lech +3 more·2004·Virchows Archiv

Abstract

Objectives The paper reviews the development of the application of telepathology in a department of surgical pathology between 1991 and 2003. The goal of the efforts during this time was to give up the concept of programming a single application, available only between two fixed workstations with sophisticated devices and special software, and to find the virtual "largest common denominator" for implementing as many different applications as possible with the same basic system. Methods A new telepathology system was designed as a client-server system with a relational database at its centre. The clients interact together by transferring the questions (texts and images) to a record (case) in the database on the server and by transferring the answers to the same record on the database. Results The new "open" telepathology system iPath (http://telepath.patho.unibas.ch) has been very well accepted by many groups around the world. The main application fields are: consultations between pathologists and medical institutions without a pathologist (e.g. for frozen section diagnoses or for surgical diagnoses in hospitals in South Asia or Africa), tumour boards, field studies and distance education (http://teleteach.patho.unibas.ch). Conclusions Having observed that with iPath we have succeeded in satisfying all our telepathology needs, we are inclined to put the emphasis on the nature of the tasks being performed, as opposed to the methods or technical means for performing a given task…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00428-004-0980-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brauchli, K., Oberli, H., Hurwitz, N., Kunze, K.-D., Haroske, G., Jundt, G., Stauch, G., Banach, L., Wirdnam, M., Mihatsch, M., & Oberholzer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt (DE)
Corresponding author
Oberholzer, Martin
Venue
Virchows Archiv
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
444
Issue
5
Pages
403-409
ISSN
  • 0945-6317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2307
OpenAlex
W1999339239
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
telepathology, client-server architecture, relational databases, surgical pathology, intraoperative frozen section, multidisciplinary tumor board, distance education, telemedicine, virtual institute, expert groups, discussion groups, teleconsultation
MeSH terms
Humans, International Cooperation, Pathology, Surgical, Switzerland, Global Health, Telepathology, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review