Cited by 32Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationGlobal Health and SurgeryDigital Imaging in Medicine

Establishing telepathology in Africa: lessons from Botswana

Open access
Fischer, Max K., Kayembe, Mukendi K., Scheer, Arnold J., Introcaso, Camille E., Binder, Scott W., Kovarik, Carrie L.·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.05.032

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues related to the quality of internet connectivity, including poor connectivity in rural areas, low speed and high cost of utility, were reported across all the countries as remaining challenges.

    “In addition, issues related to the quality of internet connectivity (e.g., poor connectivity in rural areas, low speed and high cost of utility) were reported across all the countries as remaining challenges (Chavez et al., 2016; Fischer et al., 2011; Petersen et al., 2019).”

    From Telemedicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and policy recommendations for Covid-19 and beyond (2021) · cites this paper as Fischer et al., 2011

    The 'To the Editor' section identifies adequate, high-speed Internet as a prerequisite for telepathology and says systems must accommodate international bandwidth limitations. It describes an installation in Botswana, not challenges reported across all countries, and does not report poor rural connectivity or high Internet costs. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, M. K., Kayembe, M. K., Scheer, A. J., Introcaso, C. E., Binder, S. W., & Kovarik, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kovarik, Carrie L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
986-987
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140937969
Cited by
32
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI045008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
telepathology, Botswana, sub-Saharan Africa, health infrastructure, health professions education, telehealth implementation, dermatopathology
MeSH terms
Botswana, Humans, Program Development, Telepathology, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review