Cited by 11Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Medical decision support systems in Africa

Open access
Bagayoko, C. O., Geissbuhler, A., Bediang, G.·2010·Yearbook of Medical Informatics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present an overview of the current state of computer-based medical decision support systems in Africa in the areas of public health, patient care, and consumer support. METHODS: Scientific and gray literature reviews complemented by expert interviews. RESULTS: Various domains of decision support are developed and deployed in Sub-Saharan Africa: public health information systems, clinical decision-support systems, and patient-centred decision-support systems. CONCLUSIONS: Until recently, most of these systems have been deployed by international organizations without a real ownership policy entrusted to the African stakeholders. Many of these endeavours have remained or ceased at the experimentation stage. The multiplicity of organizations has led to the deployment of fragmented systems causing serious interoperability problems. In addition to basic infrastructures, these studies also highlight the importance of good organization, training and support, as key to the success and sustainability of these decision support systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1638688

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagayoko, C. O., Geissbuhler, A., & Bediang, G.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Bediang, G.
Venue
Yearbook of Medical Informatics
Published
2010-08
Volume
19
Issue
01
Pages
47-54
ISSN
  • 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
  • 2364-0502
OpenAlex
W2224854712
Cited by
11
References
66
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Yearbook of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, clinical decision support, public health information systems, sub-Saharan Africa, interoperability, stakeholder ownership, health information infrastructure, international organizations
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Patient Care, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Telemedicine, Africa South of the Sahara, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Public Health Informatics, Resource Allocation, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review