Cited by 37Infant Development and Preterm CareHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health Education

Use of social networking sites by parents of very low birth weight infants: Experiences and the potential of a dedicated site

Gabbert, Tatjana I., Metze, Boris, Bührer, Christoph, Garten, Lars·2013·European Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Unlabelled The objective of this study was to study the experiences of parents of preterm infants who use social networking sites and the potential of such sites for gathering information and facilitating personal exchange. An anonymous self-reporting questionnaire was administered to parents of infants below 1,500 g birth weight born between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Of the 278 families who were sent a questionnaire, 141 responded; 53.6 % of respondents claimed to be presently members of online social networking sites. However, only 10.7 and 18.6 % used the Internet to exchange information about their infants during the NICU stay and after discharge, respectively. Most (64.0 %) responding parents considered that currently available commercial Internet sites inadequately met their need to exchange information as parents of preterm infants. Overall, 79.1 % of respondents reported that they would be interested in joining a native-language online networking site providing (1) general information on prematurity, (2) explanations of abbreviations commonly used in a hospital setting, and (3) details of common medical problems and the treatment thereof, including the availability of local therapists and follow-up services. Also, parents wanted to engage in personal exchange online not only with other parents but also with medical staff. Conclusion The support of parents of hospitalized preterm infants by neonatal nurses and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00431-013-2067-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of parents reported that neither currently available general social networking sites nor dedicated websites adequately met their need for information exchange.

    “However, the majority of parents reported that neither currently available general social networking sites (e.g., Facebook, etc.) nor dedicated websites (e.g., parenting sites, mother-child sites, pregnancy sites, etc.) adequately met their need for information exchange (Gabbert et al., 2013).”
  • Website/mobile apps and online local social networking moderated by healthcare professionals may offer significant benefits to families with preterm infants.

    “Additionally, website/mobile apps and online local social networking moderated by healthcare professionals may offer significant benefits to families with preterm infants (Gabbert et al., 2013; Garfield et al., 2016; Nayak et al., 2019).”
  • Parents suggested improvements to social networking sites including community non-commercial online networks, opportunity for interpersonal communication with other parents in regional, hospital-based, native-language, a medical expert moderator, general information on prematurity, explanations of commonly used abbreviations in the hospital settings, explanations of common medical problems and the

    “Parents’ suggestions to improve social networking sites included: community non-commercial online networks, opportunity for interpersonal communication with other parents in regional, hospital-based, native-language, a medical expert moderator, general information on prematurity, explanations of commonly used abbreviations in the hospital settings, explanations of common medical problems and the”
  • Parents did not seem to receive satisfactory support from online social networking sites.

    “In addition, parents did not seem to receive satisfactory support from online social networking sites (Gabbert et al., 2013).”
  • Parents of very low birth weight infants who used internet and online social networking sites described common topics of discussion including individual development of the child in comparison with others, specific prematurity-associated diseases and therapies, and/or follow-up care.

    “Parents described common topics of discussion including individual development of the child in comparison with others, specific prematurity-associated diseases and therapies, and/or follow-up care (Gabbert, Metze, Bührer, & Garten, 2013).”

    From Scoping review of interventions to support families with preterm infants post-NICU discharge (2022) · cites this paper as Gabbert, Metze, Bührer, & Garten, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabbert, T. I., Metze, B., Bührer, C., & Garten, L.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Garten, Lars
Venue
European Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2013-08-03
Volume
172
Issue
12
Pages
1671-1677
ISSN
  • 0340-6199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1076
OpenAlex
W2094598428
Cited by
37
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
social networking sites, preterm infants, very low birth weight infants, parental experiences, neonatal intensive care, parent-provider communication, health information needs, neonatal nurses
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Internet, Information Seeking Behavior, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review